March 31, 2006

Valiant 'Freedom Fighters'

From Voice of America news:
4 Israelis Killed in West Bank Suicide Bombing
By VOA News
31 March 2006

A Palestinian suicide bomber has killed four Israelis at the entrance to a West Bank Jewish settlement.

Witnesses say the bomber was disguised as a religious Jew. The Israeli military says three Israelis in a car apparently agreed to give him a ride. The attacker then blew himself up near the settlement of Kedumin, west of Nablus.

The body of the fourth Israeli was found near the site of the explosion.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, an offshoot of the Fatah Party of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, claimed responsibility for the attack. The group identified the bomber as a 24-year-old man from Hebron.

Separately, Israel carried out an airstrike in the Gaza Strip early Friday, hitting an area used by Palestinian militants for firing rockets into Israel.

Palestinians say the missile attack damaged a bridge and broke a water pipe. There were no reports of casualties.

Some information for this report was provided by AFP, AP and Reuters.
Yes indeed! What this and other reports do NOT say is that the victims were an elderly couple, Rafi and Helena Halevy, both 60, and two young people of 16 and 20. Rafi Halevy was a 7th generation Israeli.



What the reports DO mention, however, and very notably without any critical comment, is the take the mouthpiece of those valiant freedom fighters has on the matter:
"Our Palestinian people have the right to defend themselves," Hamas lawmaker Mushir al Masri said" and "[the suicide attack is] a natural response … to the continued Israeli killing, incursions and arrests".
It leaves one wondering what "law" that humanoid is making and whether those schmocks have even one heart, one braincell and one vertebra left among them to rub together.

Some little known facts from Denmark

From TCS Daily:
Descent into Dhimmitude
By J. Peter Pham & Michael I. Krauss
27 Mar 2006

While most media accounts of the "cartoon jihad" focused on the publication of the cartoons, and on the ensuing violent reaction by some Muslims -- who were depicted by the much of the press as victims! -- few reporters have ventured to describe the increasingly hostile climate that Muslim extremists had succeeded in creating in Denmark before the publication. In fact, an examination of Jyllands-Posten's own pages reveals why its editors likely decided to publish the cartoons in the first place -- as well as why the obscurantist rioters were so confident that they would prevail.

In late 2004 -- a University of Copenhagen professor of Moroccan Jewish descent -- was kidnapped in broad daylight and brutally beaten by three Muslim youths for the "crime" of having read from the Quran during a lecture. A few months later, a Danish publisher used anonymous translators for an essay collection critical of Islam for fear that any named assistant would suffer a similar fate. And in an incident immediately preceding Jyllands-Posten's decision to run the cartoons as a test of self-censorship, Danish artists refused to illustrate a children's book about Muhammad.

These incidents, all disturbing, don't even scratch the surface of the appeasement Danes have made to accommodate the people who unleashed violence against them. In Copenhagen's public schools, the only food available to students -- regardless of their religious affiliation or lack thereof -- are Halal (prepared according to Islamic dietary requirements). In Denmark, a country which enjoys well-deserved praise for the courage with which citizens came together to save its small Jewish community during World War II, Danish Jewish students today cannot attend certain public schools because their very presence is viewed by administrators as "provocative" to radicalized Muslim peers. The country's only Jewish school, Copenhagen's 300-pupil Carolineskolen, founded in 1805, nowadays is constrained to operate behind a double ring of barbed wire.

Naser Khader, the Damascus-born son of a Palestinian father and Syrian mother who has served as a Danish parliamentarian from the Social Liberal Party since 1994, now lives under round-the-clock police protection because he committed the "crime" of giving his daughter a kafir ("infidel," read "Western") name. Compounding his "apostasy," he founded a moderate Muslim group with over 700 members, Democratic Muslims, after the outbreak of the "cartoon jihad" to campaign against Islamic establishmentarianism. Imam Ahmad Abu Laban -- the same character who instigated Middle Eastern anti-Danish riots with his portfolio of doctored cartoons -- then labeled Mr. Khader and his supporters "rats in a hole." One of the members of Khader's new group, Iranian refugee Kamran Tahmesabi, recently told a Belgian newspaper, "It is an irony that I am today living in a European democratic state and have to fight the same religious fanatics that I fled from in Iran many years ago."

After the "cartoon jihad" had seemingly run its course, this past February 12, the Danish chapter of the radical group Hizb ut-Tahrir availed itself of the Scandinavian country's "decadent" freedoms to hold a meeting in the Copenhagen neighborhood of Nørrebro, where it attempted to stoke the flames of hatred. The participants at this gathering minced no words about the "infidels" who populate their country. Leader Fadi Abdullatif (who had previously received a 60-day sentence for threatening to kill Jews) turned his wrath on Denmark's popular bicycle-riding sovereign, Queen Margarethe II, whom he accused of involvement in a "conspiracy" with Jyllands-Posten and Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen to "harm Islam." The state prosecutor, under pressure from Muslim groups, declined to bring charges.
[...]
To read the rest of the article click HERE.

In spite of all politically correct gaffes, the Danes have always shown remarkable backbone when it came to not submittig to dhimmitude. This may be a relative achievement and largely due to the utter spinelessness of the rest of Europistan, but yes, an achievement it is.

The real question remains, however, why all those incidents mentioned in the above article were met with so scant interest by the dhimmified international media.

Germrabia

From the UPI website:
German school 'breeds terrorists'

BERLIN, March 30 (UPI) -- Officials from a Berlin school have issued a dramatic call for help because if rising violence and anarchy in the school.

One teacher told the Berlin daily Tagesspiegel, she had the impression that the violent environment at the school in the problematic district of Neukoelln would breed "criminals and terrorists."

For years, the Neukoelln 'Hauptschule' (a school for students age 11 to 15) has not been able to find a deputy principal; after the principal recently became sick and hasn't returned so far, teachers there have written a letter to the Federal Education Ministry, calling for help.

The teachers wrote that they are ignored and sometimes attacked in class; teachers wouldn't enter classrooms without their cell phone, so they may call for help in case of an emergency. Mass brawls and knife fights are common at the school.

The students are mainly from immigrant families; students with an Arabic background account for 44 percent, the biggest group, according to the Tagesspiegel.

"The Arabs have the say here and they oppress the Turkish students," one teacher said.

The few German students -- commonly called 'pig-meat eaters' -- try not to call on any attention to themselves, the teacher said.

Berlin's education ministry announced it would dispatch two social workers speaking Arabic and Turkish, adding police would from now control students upon entering the school building.
Note that the German media is talking delicately about pupils with a "migrant" or "non-German" background. Everything not to call a spade a spade.

The hens are coming home to roost for the 1968'er teacher generation. And the politicians of the same generation, to paraphrase Bertolt Brecht, didn't like the people they had, so they elected a new one. Now they've got what they wanted.

(Thanks Politically Incorrect and their commentators for the thoughts!) Rütli-Schule

March 30, 2006

Europistan

This is about Sabatina James of whose fate I was just made aware:
Sabatina -- a Muslim horror tale
Author: Uwe Siemon-Netto
Publication: UPI
Date: July 3, 2003
Editor's note: This sixth installment of the UPI series on dialoguing with Islam tells of a Muslim girl sentenced to death by hear father for apostasy - in the heart of Western Europe.

This is a modern Muslim horror story from Austria, whose capital, Vienna, barely avoided falling to Islam half a millennium ago. Imagine an exquisitely beautiful citizen of this ancient Christian nation having to go underground in neighboring Germany just to stay alive.

Sabatina James, 20, fled across the border to avoid being killed by her father, a Pakistani-born crane operator and taxi driver, who along with other family members sentenced her to death for apostasy. Sabatina had given up Islam, her parents' faith, and become an evangelical Christian while attending high school near the city of Linz.

Sabatina's story - the surname "James" is a nom de plume - has shocked the German-speaking part of Europe, which is grappling with the seemingly intractable problem of how to cope with its huge Muslim minorities. There are 3.5 million in Germany alone and 350,000 in Austria, and their numbers are increasing at a rate of 20-25 percent every two years, according to Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, an Islamic studies professor at the venerable University of Marburg.

"Will they integrate fully or will a substantial part of them evolve into a parallel society that neither speaks German nor adheres entirely to this country's civil laws?" Spuler-Stegemann wondered. Will these groups insist on practicing the Shari'a - religious law - as Sabatina's father evidently intends to in Austria?

Christians are not the only ones to be increasingly apprehensive about this prospect. A small reform-minded group of Islamic intellectuals calling themselves Euro-Muslims shares these fears. Linz author Guenther Ahmed Rusznak, a convert from Catholicism who tried to arbitrate between Sabatina and her father, is of this persuasion. "Ninety percent of the Islamic Community here in Linz condemn this girl, calling her a whore. This is ghastly," he said in a telephone interview.

The story of this young woman has been turned into a successful book titled, Sabatina - vom Islam zum Christentum, ein Todesurteil (Sabatina -- from Islam to Christianity - a death sentence). It is a tale full of garish details that can give you goose bumps by underscoring the frightening sway Islam can hold even over authorities in the heart of Europe.

Sabatina's family moved from Lahore in Pakistan to Austria when she was 11 years old, her publisher, Juergen Kleindienst of Vienna, told United Press International Wednesday. As so often with the daughters of Muslim immigrants in Western Europe, her troubles began when she turned 15 and wished to look and behave like her Austrian classmates.

While her parents, especially her mother, rejected the ways of the country whose citizens they had become, Sabatina rejected the traditional Pakistani dress, wore blue jeans instead and put on lipstick, just like her friends at school. "For this she was beaten up at home to such an extent that social services had to intervene," Kleindienst said.

When she was 16, her parents took her home to Lahore during the summer break and informed her that she had been promised to a cousin. According to Kleindienst, Sabatina refused this union and was promptly sent to a Koran school where her minders frequently flogged her during her six-month stay.

In the end she apparently agreed to the betrothal and was then allowed to return to Austria, where she immediately renounced the engagement. She claimed it was coerced. Back at school, a classmate talked to her about his Christian faith. She converted. Her father's reaction was: "You have dishonored our family. This honor is more important than my life or yours. Those turning their backs on our faith deserve death."

Sabatina called the police. But when she saw her father being led away in handcuffs, she refused to press charges and he was released. In the meantime, her cousin and fiancé arrived from Lahore with what publisher Kleindienst called a bogus marriage certificate, which the Austrian authorities accepted.

"The authorities could not be bothered to launch an investigation because all this had taken place so far away," said Rusznak, the arbiter. Sabatina's parents subsequently adopted the young man, who thus became her brother, husband and cousin, all in one - in staid Austria, a cradle of Western civilization.

What will happen should she later fall in love with somebody else? "That's a problem for another time," Rusznak mused. At any rate, threatened by her father, who now called her his "ex-daughter," and other family members, she sought refuge with a family of Christian refugees from Pakistan in Germany.

It didn't help of course that at one point during her family ordeal she had fallen into the hands of a Viennese photographer who promised her a career as a model if she allowed him to take a few shots of her in the nude. These pictures promptly appeared in an Austrian magazine without Sabatina's authorization.

Be that as it may, her story shows a Muslim reality, "which Europeans do not take seriously enough," in the words of Justin Samuels, a Pakistani physician and evangelical activist living in southern Germany. "Europeans only react when something horrible happens - like the Americans after Sept. 11."

Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, the Marburg professor, shares his concerns. Spuler-Stegemann has studied the conversion phenomenon extensively. "There is no evidence that people have been killed in Germany or Europe for apostasy, as would happen in Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran," she said.

"However, many have told me of serious threats," she related. "I have been told of a congregation of converts from Iran who no longer even dare to meet. There are reports, too, that groups of converts are being infiltrated (by Islamists)." Evidently, there are cases where infiltrators go as far as getting baptized in order to subvert the growing numbers of Muslims who have turned to Christianity, the professor continued.

Spuler-Stegemann, who favors a "peaceful life together with Muslims in Germany," sounded scandalized by the naivité of secular and church officials mollycoddling Muslim hardliners at the expense of moderates. "Those who warn of these dangers are being showered with lawsuits (from Islamist leaders)," she said, "and our churches are not at all playing a good role in this.

She described the current level of dialogue between Christians and Muslims as "off-beam stuff to gratify theologians," whose contacts are primarily with Islamists. "These people can't even distinguish between the different Islamic groups. They are living in cloud-cuckoo land."
Of course one can argue whether the statement "There is no evidence that people have been killed in Germany or Europe for apostasy, as would happen in Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran" makes much sense. Of course there is no official Islamist religious police (yet) established in Europe, as there is in Saudi Arabia or Iran. But I wonder what the double-barelled professor thinks the many honour killings of Muslim women in Germany are? Or are we supposed to call a spade a spade only AFTER the establishment of such a religious police?

I took Uwe Siemon-Netto's article from the HINDU VIVEK KENDRA website.

To go to Sabatina's homepage click HERE.

(Hat tip to Eurient!)

March 27, 2006

Barking up the Wrong Tree as an Art Form

Yesterday, there had been elections in the East German state of Sachsen-Anhalt. I take that opportunity to memorise an event that happened some weeks ago and a story of stunning hypocrisy.
German Neo-Nazis quash left-wing musician's show
Thu Mar 9, 2006 7:50 PM ET
To cut a long story short, members of the right wing party NPD (Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands) in Sachsen-Anhalt had successfully blocked by legal means, namely by filing a protest with the authorities, a benefit concert by left-wing singer-songwriter Konstantin Wecker.

Wecker, a political activist singer/songmaker, score composer and occasional actor, had planned to perform on March 8 at the premises of a school in the town of Halberstadt. The performance was supposed to be part of Wecker's "Nazis Get Out of Town!" tour, a non-profit series of concerts the musician has organized across East Germany in response to the recent upswing in neo-Nazi activities there.

The NPD had threatened to disrupt the Halberstadt concert if it went ahead and accused Wecker of using the school concert as a front for political campaigning on behalf of Germany's radical left Party Die Linke.

Town authorities then refused to grant Wecker a permit to perform at the intended premises, arguing the concert was an illegal commercial venture in a public schoolroom because Wecker charges EURO 10.00 (US$ 12.00) for a ticket to this tour to cover operating costs but performs for free.

Germany's Jewish community condemned the decision. 'It is a declaration of (moral) bankruptcy by Germany's political parties in the face of right-wing extremism,' said Stephan Kramer, general secretary of the Central Council of Jews, Germany's largest Jewish organization. "This makes a mockery of all such initiatives in civil society and the efforts of Konstantin Wecker to fight discrimination and xenophobia, the very things the NPD stands for,' Kramer added. 'The next politician who calls for a 'revolution of decency' (against right-wing violence), should first take a good look in the mirror.'

Sounds like one of those Good versus Evil stories, doesn't it? The idealistic artist against the forces of Evil, right?

It ain't quite so.

Who is Konstantin Wecker? Konstantin Wecker was born 1947 in Munich. He dropped out of university after four years in 1970 and continued to perform his music while working at odd jobs, from selling insurance to "starring" in pornographic films. One of his first coming-outs as a songwriter was at Munich's popular political cabaret "Münchner Lach- und Schießgesellschaft" in 1973. His breakthrough as a singer came in 1977 with the LP Genug ist nicht genug (Enough Is Not Enough), which includes Willy, a song about a man who was slain by drunken Nazis, and which became, somewhat predictably, hugely popular in a Germany whose resistance against the Nazi regime grows proportionally to the time span since May 8, 1945.

In 1996, Wecker was sentenced to two and a half years in prison without probation on charges of cocaine possession. He had acquired large amounts of "coke" over the past year which he had refined to crack. According to the public prosecutor, he was charged with a total of 1770g of cocaine. The Public Prosecution accused him of submitting his colleagues as well to the danger of drug addiction and pleaded for a three and a half years sentence. His lawyers pleaded for two years on probation. The judge sentenced him to two years and six months without probation.*

After 9/11 this paragon of virtue joined the America-bashing road show of terrorist-sympathisers. Writers, politicians, artists and intellectuals of all sorts fell over their own feet to slam, while the debris at Ground Zero was literally still smoking, not the terrorists but the US of A. The speediest one was the renegade Catholic theologian (an occupation, that will always grant the apostate a sinecure for life while he can safely cultivate his image as a rebel and martyr) Eugen Drewermann. Not later than on the evening of 9/11, he drivelled about 'embargo politics against the Iraq' on his radio show and in a bout of mental incontinence let 'Hiroshima' slip. Adrienne Goehler, Berlin's Green-"Alternative" feminist Minister for Culture revealed a slightly different agenda and found that the Twin Towers reminded her of 'phallic symbols', which is, of course, reason enough to flatten them. The renowned historian Wolfgang Benz, professor of antisemitism-research at the Technical University Berlin, termed the WTC an 'expression of arrogance', which, by implication, made the terrorist attack somewhat understandable. A chat show host who is world famous in Germany, Roger Willemsen, as vain as a bulimic teenage girl and as hollow (although not as handsome) as a Ming vase, equalled the ethics of George W. Bush to those of Osama bin Laden and waffled about the (I kid you not) 'sublimeness' of the devastation. Couturier Wolfgang Joop, who can't get over his past as a heterosexual male, saw the roots of the attack in the conflict between Israel and 'Palestine' and, again I kid you not, the 'humiliated masculinity' of the Arab male. Nobel Laureate Günter Grass, who can't get over his past as a Flakhelfer, joined the fray by comparing the relatively few victims of 9/11 to the deaths in Rwanda and Bosnia and told the Americans to get over it.**

This, dear reader, is the political climate you ought to understand before we get back to Konstantin Wecker.

In 2003, the musician took a 'peace trip' to Baghdad, which his critics snidely called a publicity stunt. 'In the event of war with Iraq, the German government ought to close down all overflights of U.S. military planes,' he told a Munich newspaper.

Mind you, neither Wecker nor his fellow freak show exhibits uttered as much as a beep when Bubba Saddam Dearest massacred hundreds of thousands of his own people over the years.

Wecker's oeuvre is full of good deeds. Together with the Jewish singer Avitall he produced a CD, which is – are we amazed? – about fighting antisemitism. That the takings from the CD are going to support the work of hagalil, the self-declared 'biggest Jewish online-magazine in Europe' can be seen as symptomatic. hagalil (with somewhat shady credentials regarding their Jewish roots) support the Israeli Left and are avid publishers of Uri Avnery, "peace activist", supporter of Al Fatah, now of Hamas, and useful idiot mouthpiece for the European Left who let him state the anti-Israel positions they don't – yet and just – dare to state themselves.

What else does our philanthropist do? Look at the Gesellschaft Kultur des Friedens (something like: Association Culture of Peace) with such glorious and dignified pitches like Friedensketten (peace necklaces).


Wecker and wifey wearing Friendensketten

Another leading activist for Kultur des Friedens is, nota bene, Mikis Theodorakis. Yes, that would be THE Mikis Theodorakis, the eminent Greek composer, political activist and political icon, who stated in a speech in November 2003 that "this small nation [i.e. the Jews] is the root of evil, not of good" and nobody in the audience (which included high officials of the Greek government) objected. As far as I remember not many did object AT ALL ANYWHERE, which shows that Kultur des Friedens is neither about culture nor peace but about something quite different.

Then, there is, again, Uri Avnery, ubiquitous at each and every opportunity for a cheap shot at Israel, even if it means to make an ass of himself by posing in children's, no… let me re-phrase that: by posing in CRAPPY children's stuff.


However, the acclaim Wecker's visit to Baghdad triggered with his fellow countrymen encouraged him to jump on the gravy train of the anti-American and anti-'Zionist'/antisemitic blogosphere with a blog called Hinter den Schlagzeilen (Behind the Headlines).

Not too surprisingly, it doesn't contain even a single own thought, just links to the usual suspects from the anti-American and anti-Zionist/antisemitic fraternity, such as the still-going-strong mouthpieces of the ruling party of the former German Democratic Republic, SED, namely Neues Deutschland and Junge Welt, or the notorious antisemitic Heise/telepolis online magazine, the Al Guardian or (now this would be funny if it weren't so sad!) the Friedensforum Duisburg.

I am seriously trying not to let my personal physical aversion against that man get into the way of the facts, because I always wanted to take a shower after I had zapped into one of his sweaty, slushy, well-nigh orgasmic performances on TV - while I was still watching TV.


His carefully stylised image as a zaftig, sensuous yet sensitive male goes down well with women of both sexes. And of course, it's so easy to forgive such a mentsch his worldly sins, isn't it?

I think Wecker is too dumb to understand his own cynicism, namely to decry "antisemitism" and "Nazis", yet to actively support another genocide of Jews by helping the cause of their enemies under the pretence of "peace" activism. I think he is too dumb, too, to understand the cynicism of another part of his performance, namely to decry "Nazism" when he is actively supporting a party that is the direct successor of the ruling party of another German dictatorship. After all, we can't really expect that a singer/songwriter of mediocre talent, who has probably blown out two of his former three brain cells by drug abuse, will know any better than our Nobel Laureate Günter Grass who – notabene – called the former Communist German Democratic Republic a 'comfortable dictatorship' ('kommode Diktatur'), can we?

Not that Wecker is particularly interesting himself. What IS interesting, however, is how he, as well as countless other mediocrities, could become the idol of a society whose values he mirrors to a "T". The German who LOVES Jews – as soon as they are well and truly dead or at least suicidal. The German without the slightest moral or ethical compass beyond decrying "violence", whatever that may imply. The hypocrite barking up the wrong tree of "Right wing extremism" while falling over his own feet backing an ideology just as nasty and selling himself as a philanthropist and do-gooder in the process.

Talking about barking up the wrong tree: the right-wing DVU, "partner" of and substitute for the NPD in the Sachsen-Anhalt elections yesterday, won 3.4% of the votes, the left-wing party Die Linke won 24.1% and ended up second behind the Christian Democrats.

Thank you for your valiant fight for democracy, Konstantin!

By the way, Germany has got a 5%-clause for the Bundestag and the state parliaments, banning all parties with a result less that 5% from entry, which lets our crusader's efforts appear even more phoney.

Just another remark: When will the obviously unteachable Jews of Germany AT LAST BEGIN to see who their enemy is, or better: where the danger for them REALLY lies? Certainly not with 3.4%-strong right-wing-extremism. But they are so pathetically grateful for everybody who does not promise to send them to the gas chambers that they will lap up any bullshit, even if it is coming from a Konstantin Wecker.



* For the biographical stuff, I relied on Konstantin Wecker: A Voice of Passion, a sycophantic fan-page, whose makers obviously don't realise that their information might, in the eyes of some people, tar their hero with a somewhat dusty brush.

** To be honest, I didn't listen to or viewed all that nauseating stuff myself. That did Henryk M. Broder who summarised it in his brilliant account of the German reaction to 9/11 Kein Krieg, nirgends. Sadly, there is no English translation so far.

Postscriptum: It wasn't just his past as a Flakhelfer, but that as an SS-man over which our Nobel-laureate couldn't get, but that expired only later and reveals yet another agenda.

March 23, 2006

WOW I am SO flattered!

I got my first hate mail today! Somebody really really thought my little effort worth responding!
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "History Meets Dhimmitude Head-On":
I strongly support the end of dhimmitude and submission. Therefore I would like to see you being slaughtered, beheaded, cut to pieces and pissed on.
Now what is REALLY cute about that is that those morons don't seem to know that they are leaving a traceable IP number and this specific IP number is the one of a computer within the ... DRUMROLL... Public Luxembourg Government Network!

Yes, and one brief look at the RIPE database and lo and behold there the network is, including contacts with full names, email addresses, telephone numbers, the lot!

And I don't even think that at 10:24 in the morning it was the cleaning woman!

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA...

March 22, 2006

History Meets Dhimmitude Head-On

Every time I think that the embarrassment, which goes by the name of 'Germany' can't be topped anymore, Austria manages to do just that. A cooperative between Christians and Muslims in Austria, christenundmuslime.at published at their website the following "declaration", of which I have translated the first paragraph. Never mind the rest, it's irrelevant and identical with any self-hating do-gooder blather of which the giving Christians are so proud and the receiving Muslims so appreciative.
ERKLÄRUNG

Wir - die unterzeichneten Christen, Muslime und die anderen Unterstützerinnen und Unterstützer dieser Erklärung - haben in Österreich eine gemeinsame geschichtliche Erfahrung: sie lehrt uns, dass Begegnung bereichert, Stereotypen und Feindbilder aber den Frieden zerstören. Wir wissen: jede Ungerechtigkeit und Unmenschlichkeit, jede pauschale Verdächtigung und jedes verhetzende Wort gegenüber Menschen anderer politischer, religiöser und sozialer Herkunft kann eine Vorform auch physischer Gewalt sein.

----------

DECLARATION

We, the undersigned Christians, Muslims and other (male and female) supporters of this declaration share a mutual historical experience in Austria: it teaches us that meeting each other is enriching, yet that stereotypes and bogeyman images destroy the peace. We know: each injustice and inhumanity, each stereotypical suspicion and each hatemongering word about people of other political, religious and social background is a potential early form even of physical violence.
Let me re-phrase that: "We, the undersigned Christians, Muslims and other (male and female) supporters of this declaration share a mutual historical experience in Austria: it happened  1529 and between 1683 and 1699 among other places at the Gates of Vienna and would have, without Rüdiger von Starhemberg, Duke Charles of Lorraine, Prince Schwarzenberg, Prince Eugen of Savoy, King Jan Sobieski of Poland and many more valiant Catholics come to a miserable end."

Isn't it fun when history meets dhimmitude head-on?

(Edited to add: THANKS PI, Beate and Stefan! I love you!)

Neither Woe, Grandeur, Nor Lust, Nor Fear -- The Lion of Münster

Laß höchster Gott / mich doch nicht auff dem Lauffplatz gleiten /
Laß mich nicht Ach nicht Pracht / nicht Lust nicht Angst verleiten!
Dein ewig-heller Glantz sey vor und neben mir /
Laß / wenn der müde Leib entschläfft / die Seele wachen
Und wenn der letzte Tag wird mit mir Abend machen
So reiß mich aus dem Thal der Finsternüß zu dir.
Aus: Abend

Let Highest God / me but not stumble on my pathway /
Let neither woe, grandeur / nor lust nor fear mislead me!
Your everlasting shine may guide and be beside me /
Let / once the tired corpse will sleep / the spirit stay awake
And when the final day will make its night for me
Then tear me from the vale of darkness home to you.
From: Night

Andreas Gryphius (1616-1664)

(Translation mine)

Count Clemens August Galen was the Bishop of Münster, the political and ecclesiastical capital of the strongly Catholic region of Westphalia from September 2, 1933 until March 22, 1946. He took an inordinately courageous stand against the Nazi policies, undaunted by the imminent danger to his own freedom and life.

His immense prestige at home and abroad and the staunch backing by the people of Westphalia was what ultimately saved him from the extermination other bishops, and many of his own priests, suffered. At the end of the day, not even the Nazis dared to touch the tall and powerful scion of one of the oldest noble families of the deeply Catholic Münsterland. In the end, the "simple pastor", who had been by far not the first choice of the Holy See as Bishop of Münster, had won the boundless reverence of his flock, an uncommon occurrence among the somewhat dour Westphalians, and, finally, the world.


Burg (Castle) Dinklage, Galen's birthplace


Clemens von Galen (he only took August as a second name when he became bishop) was born in 1878 at Burg Dinklage, seat of the family for centuries, in the Oldenburg part of the Münsterland. He was the eleventh of the thirteen children of Graf Ferdinand Heribert Galen (1831-1906), a notable member of the Catholic Zentrum party and his wife Elisabeth, née Countess von Spee. Graf Ferdinand Galen, then a member of the Deutscher Reichstag had in 1877 not just famously spoken about the importance of a social conscience and demanded a Christian-social order, but lived by it -- notably ridiculed by August Bebel.

A Long Tradition of Loyalty and Service

The Galen family looked back to a long tradition of deep loyalty and service to the Catholic Church and the family had indeed put forth many priests and bishops before.


Christoph Bernhard von Galen, "Bomben Bernd", (1606 -1678), Prince Bishop of Münster

An important part of the spiritual and political family heritage was a lively rememberance of the Prussian Kulturkampf against the Catholic Church in the 19th century, in which a relative, the Arch-Bishop of Cologne, Clemens August Droste zu Vischering, had played an important part. Droste-Vischering had been imprisoned by the Prussian authorities from 1837-1839 with the, for Prussia, unexpected and unwelcome result of a re-enforced political Catholicism.

Count Clemens' great-uncle was Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler, Bishop of Mainz, the most eminent Bishop of the 19th century, who had been known as the "workers' bishop" for his indefatigable efforts for the oppressed and exploited unskilled German workers in their struggle to form trade unions to be able to fairly bargain for better wages and decent working conditions.

Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler, Bishop of Mainz (1811-1877), "workers' bishop", Count Clemens' great-uncle

Following studies at the seminaries of Innsbruck (Tyrol) and Münster, Count Clemens was ordained to the priesthood in Münster cathedral in 1904 where, thirty years later, he would become the staunch spiritual and moral backbone of Catholic Germany.

He first served as chaplain to his uncle suffragan bishop Maximilian Gereon Graf Galen at Münster, then for 23 years as a big-city-pastor in the "diaspora" in Berlin, where he soon became known for his sense of duty, kindness and accessibility to the members of his congregation at all times.

Newly ordained priest Count Clemens within the circle of his family.

Dr. Carl Sonnenschein, Catholic priest, social reformer and head of an interreligious philantropic circle in Berlin judged him scathingly as being "entirely 13th century" because of his unfaltering opposition to any "modernisation" or revaluation of the Catholic church. 1929, Galen was appointed parish priest of the Town- and Market Church of St. Lambert, Stadt- und Marktkirche St. Lamberti zu Münster, the capital of his native Westphalia.

In January 1933 Hitler became chancellor of Germany. In February the Nazis took over the key positions in government and began to dominate all of Germany. On February 28, after the burning of the Reichstag, Hitler, persuaded Reichspräsident von Hindenburg to issue a decree effectively scrapping the basic citizen rights, which led to the passage of the Enabling Bill, the so-called Ermächtigungsgesetz, which de facto abolished the parliaments and gave the cabinet total legislative power.

On March 23, 1933 Hitler made a statement in which he promised to work for peaceful relations between Church and State. Five days later, the German bishops in a joint statement said that, though they maintained a negative attitude to Nazism in the past, in view of the public guarantee of Hitler to respect Catholic doctrine and the rights of the Church, they now believed that the previous general warnings and bans were no longer necessary, a step which paved the way for the signing of concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican, with the expectation of improved conditions for the Church. It was ratified on September 10, 1933.

On September 2 of this fateful year, Clemens Galen was appointed bishop of Münster. Nec Laudibus, Nec Timore, unconcerned about praise, undaunted by fear, became his eccesiastical motto, which already pointed towards the manner in which he would exercise his ministry in the midst of the 20th century's most cruel dictatorship.

Too Overbearing An Attitude for A Simple Pastor

It is worth noting that Pastor Count Clemens hadn't been the Holy See's first choice for Bishop of Münster. When the election of Pastor Count Galen became known in September 1933, it triggered a number of startled reactions. "The Holy Spirit will have to help a lot" was the majority's scathing reaction of those who had known the minister of St. Lambert as a passionate and well-liked pastor. However, apart from his noble birth and towering figure of 6'8", he had never appeared to be particularly notable, either as an independent theological thinker, a preacher, or a writer. His only published work was a small book through which he had expressed, in 1932, his disgust at the secularisation of public life by the progress of Liberal and Socialist ideas. Even the title of this literary attack "Die 'Pest des Laizismus' und ihre Erscheinungsformen" ("The 'Plague of Laicism' and its Manifestations", published by the renowned publishing house Aschendorff, Münster), made it obvious where the writer stood regarding any revaluation of the church.

In fact, Nuntius Cesare Orsenigo had written to then Cardinal State Secretary Eugenio Pacelli, later Pope Pius XII, about "overbearing attitude, stubbornness and too schoolmasterly a manner for a simple pastor." But, and this is not without irony, while in the Germany of 1933, Galen's conservative leanings seemed at first glance to be in line with the new powers, this turned out to be a superficial and grossly misleading notion. However, at that time, it may have backed him in the election.

Bishop Galen's travels to administer the sacrament of confirmation to the youth of his diocese were a purpose- and powerful statement of Catholic self-assertion post 1933

One of the first things the finally elected bishop did was to spiritually strengthen his people, immediately establishing Perpetual Adoration of the Eucharist in a central church in his diocese and then enbarked on a campaign of ceaseless public challenges to the neo-pagan ideology of National Socialism, so that his people would not be swept away by the, no doubt, seductive appeal of nationalistic sentiment.

The bishop paid close attention to the literature of National Socialism, and in his first Lenten Pastoral already, in January 1934, he opposed the fundamental doctrine of the new politics, namely the veneration of the "race" as the Nazis understood it.

Hell Itself Is Let loose with Its Deceit

A few weeks later he wrote his Easter Pastoral. By now, he was much more certain of where National Socialism was leading -- to the systematic destruction of the Faith. Thus, he understood that it was absolutely necessary to address the matter head-on and to use all the authority and resources of the episcopal office to open people's minds to what was happening. The pastoral was read in a solemn manner, and was listened to by a crowded congregation in expectant silence. It didn't leave any doubt in its lucidity: "Hell itself is let loose with its deceit", the bishop warned, "which may even mislead good men". And: "With holy joy we will, should God permit them, like the martyrs endure abuse and persecution."

At the end of May 1935, Galen wrote to the Oberpräsident (governor) of Westphalia, protesting against a proposed rally in Münster where the chief Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg was scheduled to speak. In his Easter Pastoral, Galen had publicly denounced Rosenbergs infamous book 'Myth of the 20th Century' as "born-again-heathen heresy". "The overwhelming part of the Christian population of Westphalia", Galen said, "could regard the appearance of Rosenberg only as an outright provocation, designed to pour contempt on their holiest and most cherished religious convictions". On July 7, the massive rally was held in Münster's main square in front of the bishop's palace. Bishop Count Galen was reviled as a reactionary and as a leader of a political brand of Catholicism that refused to recognise that times had changed.

The next day, Catholic Münster retorted with a huge procession.

Galen spoke to the crowd and made it very clear that he would never yield to the enemies of Christianity and the persecutors of the Church.

One year later, when the day for the big Easter procession of 1936 arrived, the police, well aware of the huge crowd the bishop had drawn the previous year, roped off the cathedral square to prevent large numbers of people from assembling. The bishop went to the pulpit of the cathedral and thundered his protest: "Can the shepherd be severed from his flock? Can the police divide Catholics from their own bishop by ropes and chains?" (There were loud shouts of 'no!' from the crowd.) "They can't be divided... Sorrowful times, my dear people of Münster are at hand but I know that steadfastness will prevail".

The campaign of vilification of the clergy was intensified in the Nazi press. Readers were fed sensationalist charges of sexual immorality among priests and members of religious orders. "Immorality trials" were staged in courts and, by devious manipulation, were made to appear as an unbroken series of clerical offences.

"So it's not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a
struggle with the Churches.
The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural
death..."
Adolf Hitler, 14 October 1941.

Priests were pilloried as idlers and criminals and the bishop of Münster particularly targeted. Organised groups of thugs threw stones at the windows of his residence at night, singing obscene songs accompanied by the noise of breaking glass. The degree of observation imposed on Catholic bishops, both over their private lives and their high office, was unprecedented, even by Nazi standards, and got even worse during the war years. The Nazis gradually and effectively destroyed the independence of the Catholic press by a series of draconian laws. From April 1935, articles with a religious content were forbidden, in 1936 the publication of pastoral letters was altogether banned.

His Was A Simple Piety

What were the sources of the bishop's courage and vision during those years? We get some idea of this aspect of von Galen's life by a consideration of his personal piety. He had a deeply supernatural view of life, an attitude impressed on his mind from early childhood. The great truths of God's intervention in human history were constantly before his mind, reinforced by daily reading of the Scriptures. On the other hand, his was a simple piety which expressed itself in love for the Blessed Eucharist, in devotion to the Rosary, to relics and pilgrimages. He was very conscious of the effects of original sin, and consequently he not only went to confession frequently, but lived in a deep spirit of self-denial with regard to food and creature comforts. He did the Stations of the Cross every Friday afternoon. He renewed the consecration of his diocese to the Sacred Heart, a devotion which grew and matured deeply in his soul, especially during the war years.

He Called Them Thieves and Robbers to Their Faces

Time and again the bishop had argued with the authorities in Berlin because of the lawlessness of NSDAP and Gestapo and cited his lost honour as German man and bishop. That he thought it likely to be imprisoned at an early stage shows a document dating February 22, 1936, where the bishop ruled in detail what should happen in the case of, as he put it, "use of force" against himself, namely ringing of the mourning bells and after that total silence for the time of his "hold-up". The priests of his diocese appreciated the way their chief pastor stood up against the new heathenism, and how he supported them in their personal ordeals, when the Nazi campaign against his priests became increasingly vicious. Apart from those sent to the front, others were taken into 'protective custody', the disgusting euphemism used by the Gestapo for their actions, others were expelled from giving religious instruction, others again were sent to Dachau, the concentration camp near Munich, from which they were never to return. At Dachau had been established a "special block" for priests, where more than 2800 were imprisoned. Almost 500 from Germany and Austria, more than 1500 from Poland and about 150 priests from other countries, plus 60 Protestant pastors. From theology student to bishop, nobody was spared. The oldest priest captive was 82.

Bishop Count Galen in an undated photograph

Bishop Galen protested at every outrage committed against his priests and publicly exposed the crimes of the Gestapo with considerable risk to his own life. During the war years he maintained a copious correspondence with his priests at the front, who wrote to him about their experiences, the joys of their priestly work, or the burden of the Cross in their lives. They wrote to him as they would to a father, and he replied to every one of those letters personally. On the occasion of major feasts of the Church, he used to send them a circular letter to tell them about the joys and sorrows of their home diocese.

On Saturday 12 July, the Gestapo confiscated two Jesuit houses in Münster. As soon as the bishop heard about it, he went to the premises and caught the Gestapo in the act of driving the priests from their homes. He called them thieves and robbers to their faces. That night he wrote the sermon, which drew him to the attention of the world.

In this sermon he attacked the Nazis cadidly, without any thought of his own security. No German citizen, he said, had any defence against their power; they had replaced the courts and were above the law. He continued: "Not one of us is certain, though he be the most loyal, the most conscientious citizen, though he knows himself innocent, I say that not one of us is certain that he will not any day be dragged from his house and carried off to the cells of some concentration camp. I know full well that this may happen to me, perhaps now or on some future day. And it is because I shall then no longer be able to speak out publicly that I do so today. I openly warn them not to pursue these actions which I am firmly convinced will call down God's punishment and bring our people to misery and ruin".

"Christianity is an invention of sick brains."
Adolf Hitler, 13 December 1941.

He made it clear that because he was bound by his oath as bishop to uphold the moral order, he had to speak out publicly against the acts of the Gestapo and finished off with an uncompromising warning: "We demand Justice! If this plea is unheard and unheeded, if the rule of true justice is not brought back, our German nation will, notwithstanding the bravery of our soldiers and their splendid victories, collapse from internal corruption and uncleanness".

Bishop Galen was well aware that in saying what he said, he was not just going to be pilloried in the press, he knew he was playing with his life, but he was fully prepared to be martyred. Before delivering his famous sermons, he instructed his household to take a change of clothing to prison should he be arrested. Several times he was ready to speak up publicly for the Jews as well, but in the end he didn't because representatives of the Jewish community of Münster begged him not to because this might turn out as (according to their own, fatal, judgement) even more harmful to them.

Galen, together with his cousin the Bishop of Berlin Konrad Graf Preysing and the Archbishop of Freiburg, Conrad Gröber, a "hardliner" within the German episcopacy, had carefully contemplated the consequences of such a spectacular "resort to publicity", as he himself called his protests in a letter to his neighbour, Bishop Berning of Osnabrück, a correspondence that was discovered only in 1976. There he called it his conscientious duty to speak up publicly for freedom of the church and human dignity and "if necessary, sacrifice the own freedom and life". And, as he couldn't in the end convince the other bishops to go the way with him, he went alone.

On August 3, 1941, Galen thundered from the pulpit of his see, St. Lambert's church: "Woe to men, woe to our German people, if God's holy Commandment, 'Thou shalt not kill,' is not only disobeyed but if this transgression is also tolerated and goes unpunished."

Galen's secretary, who was present at St Lambert's for the sermon, recalled the scene. The bishop prayed for several minutes before he mounted the steps of the pulpit. There was a quiver in the first few sentences; after that he spoke with a great strength and composure. His towering figure left an impression of great dignity and superior presence. His voice sounded like thunder as the challenging words fell on the expectant congregation, some trembling, some gazing at him with tears in their eyes. Protest, indignation, fiery enthusiasm surged successively. The calm, the self-assurance, and latent power of Galen's delivery that morning in St Lambert's. This unwavering strength in those unnerving circumstances would remain with him all the way during the rest of his struggle against the Nazi regime.

At the end of July 1941, the chaplain at the mental asylum in Marienthal in the diocese of Münster, called on the bishop to inform him about one more sinister experience. A number of the mentally ill patients had been removed to be killed because they were 'unproductive'. This was what triggered off Galen's historic sermon, in which he attacked the Nazi practice of euthanasia and condemned the "mercy killings" taking place in his own diocese.

A curse on men if we break the holy commandment 'Thou shalt not kill'

Now, again at St. Lambert's, he condemned this ghastly doctrine which tried 'to justify the murder of blameless men', and which sought 'to give legal sanction to the forceable killing of invalids, cripples, the incurable and the incapacitated'. He had ascertained at the Ministry of Health that no attempt was made to hide the fact that many mentally ill people had already been purposely killed and that the process would continue. He called the perpetrators of these crimes murderers and demanded protection for the innocent. "If", he said, "the principle is established that unproductive human beings may be killed, then God help all those invalids who, in order to produce wealth, have given their all and sacrificed their strength of body. If all unproductive people may thus be violently eliminated, then woe betide our brave soldiers who return home wounded, maimed or sick. Once admit the right to kill unproductive persons, then none of us can be sure of his life. A curse on men and on the German people if we break the holy commandment 'Thou shalt not kill'... Woe to us German people if we not only licence this heinous offence but allow it to be committed with impunity".

The impact of his sermon reached far beyond the crowded congregation that flocked to hear him. Thousands of copies were distributed throughout the country; they were, too, smuggled to soldiers at the front where his references to the threat of death hanging over invalids and seriously wounded soldiers spread with lighting speed.

Galen's words had an unexpected, amazing and powerful effect. By the end of August, the programme for euthanasia had been suspended, but roughly 100,000 people had been killed already.

Copies of these 1941 sermons spread all over Germany; hundreds of thousands were printed in response to requests from many cities. These and other sermons were so important to the Allies that they were printed by the million and dropped by the RAF as anti-Nazi propaganda all over Germany and the occupied territories. The Nazi party staged a campaign against the bishop all over the country. Official German documents discovered after the war records of discussions among Nazi leaders about how to get rid of him. In Berlin, his sermons were regarded as 'the strongest attack against the German political leadership for decades' and he was declared to show staatsfeindliche Gesinnung, an attitude hostile to the German state as the Nazis understood it, usually akin to a death warrant. But the Nazis still hesitated to harm Galen personally, not to cause an uprising in the Münsterland, but planned instead to kill him after the "Endsieg".

Galen's see, St Lambert's Church, Lambertikirche zu Münster, the place of his his fateful sermons.

Hitler had any reason to fear him far beyond his regional importance as a bishop, because of the powerful anti-Nazi propaganda Galen provided to the Allies. One of the directors of propaganda in the British War Office, Brigadier R. L. Sedgwick, a convert to Catholicism, recalled that during the war the BBC sent out transmissions specifically targeting the forty million German and Austrian Catholics. Day after day, the broadcasts from London drove home the point of Hitler's hatred for the Catholic faith. The bishop's sermons, Sedgwick said, were like manna from heaven in the propaganda war against the Nazis. The BBC transmissions, drawing on these sermons, also endeavored to show that National Socialism implicated a serious threat to the family and the religious and ethical ideals for which it stood.

It was a great consolation for the bishop to know that by his words he had given courage and heart to those of his countrymen who repudiated everything Nazism stood for. Towards the end of August, he received a letter from the bishop of Innsbruck, telling him that the Holy Father had read his recent homilies aloud to his closest associates in the Vatican, expressing the strongest possible approval of them. Shortly afterwards, he received a letter of warm congratulation from Pius XII: "They (the sermons) have caused us also consolation and satisfaction such as we have not felt for a long time on the path of sorrows which we have followed with the Catholics of Germany".

Münster Cathedral, der Dom zu Münster, in today's restored state

He Wept in Silence

On October 10, 1943 Münster cathedral was bombed to rubble by the British. It was a Sunday. In the early afternoon, under a clear autumn sky, when the congregation had gathered in front the doorway to celebrate the motherhood of Mary and the high altar blazed with candles, the sirens howled. The first high explosive bomb fell with extreme precision on the vault of the west quadrant. From above, the west entrance of the cathedral, crowned by imposing Romanesque towers, was a target difficult to miss. The survivors fled, seeking shelter under the walls of the tower. Seemingly as solid as the sky, those towers had watched over the city of Münster for seven centuries. The second high explosive bomb hit them square. They fell, toppling like a garbage heap. Then a downpour of incendiary bombs followed, which lit the hit buildings up like torches. In a few minutes the proud ancient city of Münster went up in flames.

Canon Alois Schröer reported: "When the sirens sounded the alarm the bishop was putting on his vestments to go into the cathedral. He had no time to get to the air-raid shelter. High explosive bombs hit and destroyed his residence. He stood clutching the only wall left standing". When his secretary Heinrich Portmann found him while the planes were still flying over the city "I saw the Most Reverend Monsignor up above, under the open sky among the smoking ruins... miraculously he was unharmed. With difficulty I helped him down.... Later, in the shelter of the Ludgerianum College, I told him of the faithful who had died... of Vicar Emmerich and of the fifty nine nuns of the Charity of Saint Clement, who had all flown to heaven together from their convent, which had been hit squarely by an incendiary bomb. That night he asked me to accompany him to the cathedral. He stood there, motionless, in front of that rubble devoured by the flames. He wept in silence".

The destroyed city of Münster and Bishop Count Galen among the debris of the Cathedral square

Because of the damage to the city, the bishop and the diocesan administration had to move out to Sendenhorst, a small town about 20 km South East of Münster. As the weeks wore on and the Allies advanced, the bombardment of the towns became more and more intense. Bishop Galen was saddened by the constant flow of bad news, of destruction and death.

On Easter Sunday, March 31, 1945, American tanks finally rolled into Sendenhorst. Bishop Galen personally drove out to meet and welcome them, whereupon he entered into regular contact with the provisional military government for the assistance of his people, giving encouragement and hope to both sides. On 12 April, the Bishop went to Münster for the first time since it had been occupied by the Americans. His purpose was to make a public protest against the excesses of the freed Russian and Polish slave labourers who had been released by the Allies. They had been abominably treated and now, unrestricted by the military, were taking their revenge. Galen preached and protested as ardently against any injustices then as he had done so before, and on July, 24 1945 he had to account for his actions at a tribunal of the military government in Warendorf. He explained frankly that he would follow, as always, his pastoral duties and not abide to any directives and that they could do what they like with him. Thomas Mann, far away California, ridiculed him in July 1945 and mocked what he considered Galen's 'patriotic idiocies'.

Politically, the bishop was, not too surprisingly, deeply conservative. A befitting memorial for the man Galen was set up by the British Foreign Office by describing him as "the most outstanding personality among the clergy in the British zone.... Statuesque in appearance and uncompromising in discussion, this oak-bottomed old aristocrat ... is a German nationalist through and through."

He had a mountain of correspondence to deal with from all parts of Germany. There were queues waiting for him at all hours of the day with all the anxieties of a people devastated by the war and its terrible consequences. Reporters came from all parts of the world trying to get interviews with the bishop who had defied the Nazi regime, and who had lived to tell the tale. The writer of these lines knows from contemporary personal witness that Bishop Count Galen worked in his shirtsleeves together with those who removed the debris that once had been the city of Münster.

In a letter dated 25 September 1945 Pope Pius XII he talked about the "the terrible conditions in the occupied territories" and begged him to intervene with "direct help through remonstrations to the victorious powers". On 6 January 1946 he had gone to celebrate the Epiphany in the ruins of the sanctuary of the town of Telgte. He closed his sermon with the words: "Under Nazism I publicly declared, and I also wrote it directly to Hitler in 1939, when no power was then intervening to block his expansionist aims: 'Justice is the basis of the State; if justice is not re-established, then our people will die from inner putrefaction'. Today I must declare: if the law is not respected among peoples, then peace and concord among peoples will never come."

The First Bishop of Münster Ever To Wear The Purple

Earlier, the Sunday before Christmas, it had been announced on the wireless that Pope Pius XII was going to create thirty new cardinals, among them Bishop Count Galen, Galen's cousin the Bishop of Berlin Konrad Graf Preysing and the Archbishop of Cologne, Joseph Frings. Galen would be the first bishop of Münster ever to wear the Purple.

Cardinal Count Galen on board of the US Airforce plane that took him (different from the erroneous German caption) home from --not to-- Rome

That he had earned it was the unanimous verdict of the Catholic world. After his famous 1941 sermons, letters arrived by the hundred at the episcopal palace to thank the Bishop of Münster for his courageous stand. Now five years later, letters of congratulation poured in by the thousands, cheering the honour bestowed on him. They were from people from every walk of life, academics, professional people, soldiers, non-Catholics, non-believers, government representatives -- the list was endless.

"God bless you, God bless your country"

The travel to Rome took seven days in post-war Europe. On Thursday morning, February 18, 1946, the new cardinals finally received the Red Hat from Pius XII in St Peter's in the public consistory. They then processed from the Blessed Sacrament Chapel, where they had taken the oath always to defend the rights of the Holy Church, to the main altar, where the Holy Father was enthroned. Each national group in the huge congregation greeted their cardinal with applause. In a detailed account of the ceremony, the priest who was assigned train-bearer to Bishop Count Galen reported: "When the cardinals were entering St. Peter and Clemens August appeared at the door, a murmur came up from the crowd. 'There he is!' I, as train-bearer, walked immediately behind the cardinal and could hear what people said and when his towering figure crossed the central aisle, a wave of great joy arose. The applause turned into thundering ovations when the cardinal mounted the steps to the throne of the Holy Father." As the Italian newspapers described it the next day: Un applauso trionfale! The Holy Father imposed the red hat, and, as he leaned forward to embrace Galen, he whispered, "God bless you, God bless your country". When Galen turned to face the vast crowd he was greeted with a storm of applause led by the other cardinals, which lasted several minutes. The crowd in St Peter's that morning were conscious they were witnessing a unique event, a recognition of moral and physical courage on a par with that of the Roman martyrs of the nascent Christian Church.

After visiting a number of German POW camps in Italy, where he already appeared to be not feeling well, he returned to Germany in a plane, graciously provided by the US Airforce, and on the afternoon of Saturday 16th March, his 68th birthday, he arrived home in triumph to his episcopal city. Fifty thousand people had congregated around the great pile of rubble, which had once been the proud cathedral of Münster.

Cardinal Count Galen's reception in front of destroyed Münster cathedral on his return from Rome

He responded to all the addresses of welcome and congratulation with the simple dignity by which he was always known. Neither he nor the huge crowd who listened with pride and joy to his words realized that this was to be their bishop's farewell. His fight, so he told them, had been made possible by the unshakeable faith of the people of Münster; it was the staunch spirit of this unconquerable diocese that was the cause of his being alive that day. When he returned to his rooms after the fireworks display, he did not feel well.

The Only Man Who Had Stood Up for Their Rights Was Dead

The following day, Sunday 17th, he said a pontifical High Mass. His last words to the faithful of Münster were an exhortation to papal loyalty, especially to the reigning pope, Pius XII. The choir sang the Te Deum in celebration. Unfortunately, he wouldn't allow a doctor to be called until Tuesday morning. The diagnosis was serious and the operation revealed a perforation of the appendix. It was too late for the doctors to do anything about it. He died on Friday, March 22.


He lay in state for four days in the Church of St Mauritz during which an unending procession filed past the catafalque. It is not difficult to imagine the sense of loss which the people of Münster suffered. The only man who had ever stood up for their rights was now dead.

On March 28 the burial took place.

The same crowd that just a week before had shouted in joy and celebration at their cardinal's triumphant return from Rome, now stood silent and stunned in the rubble of the streets of Münster as the huge coffin, drawn by four horses, passed.

The cardinal's last resting place was the Galen Chapel amid the ruins of his cathedral, where the remains of a former Galen, Prince Bishop Christoph Bernhard, had been laid to rest in 1678. As the cardinal's coffin was lowered into the ground, a mighty sound rose up from the congregation, as they sang the magnificent Easter hymn Wahrer Gott wir glauben Dir ("True God We Believe in You", incidentally the work of another son of Münster, Christoph Bernhard Verspoell, dated 1810). It resounded through the ruins of the cathedral and the vestiges of the streets and lanes, bearing witness to the unconquerable hope, faith and spirit of the people of Münster.

Postscriptum:

On November 16, 2004, in the presence of Pope John Paul II, the Congregation for Causes of Saints promulgated a decree linking a miracle to Cardinal Clemens August Count Galen and on October 9, 2005 Galen was beatified by Pope Benedict XVI, and not surprisingly to the chagrin of the "progressive" fellowship in- and outside the Catholic Church.

Pope John Paul II and Bishop Reinhard Lettmann 1987 at Cardinal Galen's grave

The Catholic Church, so far, has been remarkably hesitant in beatifying its own leading members of the German resistance. Until Galen's beatification, only one, a layman, the Catholic labour leader and editor Nikolaus Gross (1898-1945), who was beheaded in Plötzensee prison in Berlin, was thus elevated.

Galen's rise to a position preceding sainthood is important for a number of reasons, of which the most poignant one is the fact, that, at a time, when euthanasia seems to have, again, become an acceptable practise in many Western countries, when the abortion of fetuses with Down's Syndrome, or just diagnosed with Down's Syndrome, has become a routine day-to-day operation and when children, having undergone a "late term termination of pregnacy", survive their own abortion, Cardinal Galen's maxim is as important now as it was 70 years ago.

"There is no such thing as life unworthy of living."




Sources and further reading:

Information including the full text of his famous sermons and the Gestapo correspondence regarding Bishop Galen.

Blessed anti-Nazi Cardinal by Uwe Siemon-Netto.

A bishop under the moral bombs: The Lion of Münster, «the most relentless opponent of Nazism», as the New York Times described him in 1942, condemned the terrible Allied bombing that razed German cities to the ground. These pages contain the letters that the bishop wrote to Pius XII during the war years by Stefania Falasca.

Biographical information and pictures from the archives of the Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe.

Burgwald Dinklage with information on the Galen family history and the House Burg Dinklage.

Christendom Awake: FAITH AND FATHERLAND by Fr Thomas McGovern.

Hitlers Tischgespräche.

Surprisingly enough...

Goodness, will wonders ever end? Yesterday the Pope admits that Christianity is not the most barbaric of all creeds and finally does away with a much-cherished bit of revisionist history, today some NATO members defend a Christian convert in a Muslim country. (We reported the case on Monday.)

WOW! Don't they realise that the Muslims might get mad now and not like us anymore?
US, NATO allies defend Afghan Christian convert
21 Mar 2006 20:38:46 GMT

Source: Reuters
By Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor

ROME, March 21 (Reuters) - The United States and three NATO allies with troops in Afghanistan expressed concern to the Kabul government on Tuesday about reports that an Afghan convert to Christianity faced the death penalty there.

The United States, which counts Afghan President Hamid Karzai as a key ally in the region, urged religious freedom in talks with visiting Afghan Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah.

"We have underscored the importance of freedom of worship, tolerance and freedom to express oneself, as a core element of democracy," said U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.

"This is, at the moment, a legal issue for the Afghan government and we would urge the Afghan government to proceed in a fair and transparent manner."

Italy called in the Afghan ambassador in Rome, two Berlin cabinet ministers spoke out and Germany's top Catholic cardinal demanded his freedom. Canada said it was concerned and urged the Afghan government to meet its human rights obligations.

The protests present a dilemma for Karzai, who needs foreign troops to defend against al Qaeda and Taliban remnants.
[...]
An Afghan judge said on Sunday a man named Abdur Rahman had been jailed for converting from Islam to Christianity and could face the death penalty if he refused to become a Muslim again. Sharia, or Islamic law, stipulates death for apostasy.

"If this news is confirmed, Italy will move at the highest level ... to prevent something which is incompatible with the defence of human rights and fundamental freedoms," an Italian Foreign Ministry statement said.

Italy's former president Francesco Cossiga wrote to Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, now campaigning for reelection, and urged him to withdraw Italian troops from Afghanistan unless he wins assurances from Kabul over Rahman's safety.

"It is not acceptable that our soldiers should put themselves at risk or even sacrifice their lives for a fundamentalist, illiberal regime," Cossiga wrote.

CARDINAL URGES RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

"We will do everything possible to save the life of Abdul Rahman," German Development Minister Heide Wieczorek-Zeul told the daily Bild, which said Rahman had converted to Christianity while living in Germany for nine years.
[...]
Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier expressed "deep concern" and said he would also intervene if necessary. Berlin's embassy in Kabul was "in close contact with the Afghan side" on this, he told the Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper.

Germany's top Catholic prelate, Cardinal Karl Lehmann, described the case against Rahman as "an alarming signal".

"The German Bishops' Conference solemnly demands that Christians in Afghanistan be able to practice their faith openly and freely and that conversion to Christianity must be possible without any disadvantages," he said in a statement.

"German bishops will try to ensure Christians in Islamic countries enjoy the same rights as Muslims have in our country."
[...]
Yeah Bishop, and good luck to you! Didn't our Literature Nobel Laureate and premier Islam-sympathiser Günter Grass suggest that we re-dedicate a Christian church and turn it into a mosque? As soon as that happens vice-versa in an Islamic country I'll say that your "trying" is "ensuring" something.

By the way, how Abdur Rahman found the Christian faith and in Germany, of all places, remains a miracle to me. Let's hope and (if you are so inclined) pray that he survives to tell us more about his remarkable self.

Will Christians riot now?

Greser & Lenz, tame cartoonists of the oh-so-"conservative FAZ, Greser & Lenz, those paragons of tasteless -- no, let me re-phrase that -- of ETHICALLY OBTUSE comparisons (remember their comparison between WWI, WWII and the war in Afghanistan?) have been at it again:



Yeah! Haha... VERY funny! The Angel of The Lord as an aliferous animal prone to bird flu "cough cough" and Adam telling Eve that it might be their last chance to get in again because the angelic guard might have caught bird flu.

In cases like that I sometimes feel that just a tiny wee little bit of cartoon-rioting might be alright, but there is no such hope.

March 21, 2006

About Freaking Time

"About freaking time" the email from The Sage from Texas was headed when she sent me the link to the following TimesOnline article:
Vatican change of heart over 'barbaric' Crusades
From Richard Owen in Rome

THE Vatican has begun moves to rehabilitate the Crusaders by sponsoring a conference at the weekend that portrays the Crusades as wars fought with the “noble aim” of regaining the Holy Land for Christianity.

The Crusades are seen by many Muslims as acts of violence that have underpinned Western aggression towards the Arab world ever since. Followers of Osama bin Laden claim to be taking part in a latter-day “jihad against the Jews and Crusaders”.

The late Pope John Paul II sought to achieve Muslim- Christian reconciliation by asking “pardon” for the Crusades during the 2000 Millennium celebrations. But John Paul’s apologies for the past “errors of the Church” — including the Inquisition and anti-Semitism — irritated some Vatican conservatives. According to Vatican insiders, the dissenters included Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI.

Pope Benedict reached out to Muslims and Jews after his election and called for dialogue. However, the Pope, who is due to visit Turkey in November, has in the past suggested that Turkey’s Muslim culture is at variance with Europe’s Christian roots.

At the conference, held at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University, Roberto De Mattei, an Italian historian, recalled that the Crusades were “a response to the Muslim invasion of Christian lands and the Muslim devastation of the Holy Places”.

“The debate has been reopened,” La Stampa said. Professor De Mattei noted that the desecration of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem by Muslim forces in 1009 had helped to provoke the First Crusade at the end of the 11th century, called by Pope Urban II.

He said that the Crusaders were “martyrs” who had “sacrificed their lives for the faith”. He was backed by Jonathan Riley-Smith, Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Cambridge University, who said that those who sought forgiveness for the Crusades “do not know their history”. Professor Riley-Smith has attacked Sir Ridley Scott’s recent film Kingdom of Heaven, starring Orlando Bloom, as “utter nonsense”.

Professor Riley-Smith said that the script, like much writing on the Crusades, was “historically inaccurate. It depicts the Muslims as civilised and the Crusaders as barbarians. It has nothing to do with reality.” It fuels Islamic fundamentalism by propagating “Osama bin Laden’s version of history”.

He said that the Crusaders were sometimes undisciplined and capable of acts of great cruelty. But the same was true of Muslims and of troops in “all ideological wars”. Some of the Crusaders’ worst excesses were against Orthodox Christians or heretics — as in the sack of Constantinople in 1204.

The American writer Robert Spencer, author of A Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, told the conference that the mistaken view had taken hold in the West as well as the Arab world that the Crusades were “an unprovoked attack by Europe on the Islamic world”. In reality, however, Christians had been persecuted after the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem.
[...]
Well, what can I say apart from: "ABOUT FREAKING TIME!"

Today is the UN's "Anti-Racism Day"

In the course of their history, the UN have taken great pains to denounce virtually each and every form of racism. It has formed programs to fight racism — including xenophobia — but had all the time refused to do anything against anti-Semitism.

Only on November 24, 1998, more than 50 years into their history, the word "anti-Semitism" was first mentioned in a UN resolution, appearing near the end of GA Res. A/53/623, "Elimination of Racism and Racial Discrimination."

Since the Seventies when UN's original 55 members had grown into a membership of more than 150, many of these member nations having never known anything even faintly like freedom or democracy, the UN has become a carrier of virulent antisemitism and anti-Zionism.

Statements like “Is it not the Jews who are exploiting the American people and trying to debase them?” by Libyan UN Representative Ali Treiki, “The Talmud says that if a Jew does not drink every year the blood of a non-Jewish man, he will be damned for eternity” by Saudi Arabian delegate Marouf al-Dawalibi before the 1984 UN Human Rights Commission conference on religious tolerance or the claim of the Palestinian representative to the UN Human Rights Commission on March 11, 1997 that the Israeli government had injected 300 Palestinian children with the HIV virus remain unchallenged.

The 1991 nominal repeal of the resolution libeling Zionism hasn't changed much of the facts. The same month the repeal was made, the UN's General Assembly passed four new one-sided resolutions against Israel:

On December 9, 1991, Israel's handling of the intifada was condemned by a vote of 150-2.

On the 11th, it voted 104-2 for a resolution calling for a UN-sponsored peace conference that would include the PLO and voted 142-2 to condemn Israeli behavior toward Palestinians in the territories.

On December 16 — the very day it repealed the Zionism measure — the UN voted 152-1, with the U.S. abstaining, to call on Israel to rescind a Knesset resolution declaring Jerusalem its capital, to demand Israel's withdrawal from “occupied territories,” including Jerusalem and to denounce Israeli administration of the Golan Heights.

Another resolution expressed support for Palestinian self-determination and the right of return for Palestinian refugees.

In their anticipating obedience towards the oil-rich Arab countries, the United Nations have considerably weakened the international fight against global terrorism. The General Assembly, so taken with the cause of Palestinian self-determination, has so far shown little interest in the plights of, for example, the Kurds or the Karabagh Armenians.

Palestinian Arab refugees, different from all other refugee groups worldwide, enjoy the support of their very own UN agency: UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency. All other refugee groups het their help from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

Since 1951 by means of legal protection and emergency relief, UNHCR has successfully helped more than 25 million refugees to make a new start.

No lasting solution has been found for Palestinian Arab refugees since 1948. The UNRWA defines Palestinian Arab refugees as "persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict." Different from that, the UNHCR definition, which is the international norm, defines a refugee as someone who "is outside his/her country of nationality or habitual residence; has well-founded fear of persecution because of his/her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion; and is unable or unwilling to avail himself/herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution." Why is that? The UNRWA was founded by General Assembly Resolution 302 in December 1949. From the beginning the agency had an extraordinary degree of freedom, mostly due to the influence of UN's Arab members. Thus it was free to set up its own definitions, rules and guidelines, which were amazingly different from those of the UNHCR and put the Palestinian Arabs in a grossly privileged position, which, of course, can be, and IS, seen as a generous invitation to apply terrorism as a legal means.



Happy "Anti-Racism Day", UN!

(Thanks to The Jewish Virtual Library for some of the information!)