Didn't a mutual "acquaintance" of ours have something ridiculous to say about about the picture? Something about the "woman, looking with sexual fondness at the black man" demonstrating the desire to make white women sexually subservient to blacks, etc. Maybe not those words exactly, but something to that intent.
What a dilemma if you believe in evolution but are a racist or a bigot, since science says the human race originated in Africa. So to get around that now we have spontaneous generation of multiple human races in the dim past?
It is a bit of stretch to "color" the 35,000 year old human. That's like paleontologists "coloring" dinosaurs. It's all speculation. But who knows? However, retrograde racism especially that far back, is a puzzling phenomenon and only allows its proponents to to paint themselves in a corner.
"Didn't a mutual "acquaintance" of ours have something ridiculous to say about about the picture?"
As I go there rarely, I have missed that, but I am not amazed.
"Something about the "woman, looking with sexual fondness at the black man" demonstrating the desire to make white women sexually subservient to blacks, etc."
Right! The sexually aggressive Negro coming back after 35,000 years to haunt and subjugate the innocent, helpless, trusting white woman from the grave and evoking a totally unwanted "sexual fondness". What about a condescending cow, exploiting primitive black men?
Shouldn't an allegedly conservative site thematize feminism? Ah well, whatever.
Basically, I like the evolutionary concept of the human race coming from Africa. It's so baseless and unimportant and it causes so many knotted knickers among idiots of all hues.
2 comments:
Didn't a mutual "acquaintance" of ours have something ridiculous to say about about the picture? Something about the "woman, looking with sexual fondness at the black man" demonstrating the desire to make white women sexually subservient to blacks, etc. Maybe not those words exactly, but something to that intent.
What a dilemma if you believe in evolution but are a racist or a bigot, since science says the human race originated in Africa. So to get around that now we have spontaneous generation of multiple human races in the dim past?
It is a bit of stretch to "color" the 35,000 year old human. That's like paleontologists "coloring" dinosaurs. It's all speculation. But who knows? However, retrograde racism especially that far back, is a puzzling phenomenon and only allows its proponents to to paint themselves in a corner.
"Didn't a mutual "acquaintance" of ours have something ridiculous to say about about the picture?"
As I go there rarely, I have missed that, but I am not amazed.
"Something about the "woman, looking with sexual fondness at the black man" demonstrating the desire to make white women sexually subservient to blacks, etc."
Right! The sexually aggressive Negro coming back after 35,000 years to haunt and subjugate the innocent, helpless, trusting white woman from the grave and evoking a totally unwanted "sexual fondness". What about a condescending cow, exploiting primitive black men?
Shouldn't an allegedly conservative site thematize feminism? Ah well, whatever.
Basically, I like the evolutionary concept of the human race coming from Africa. It's so baseless and unimportant and it causes so many knotted knickers among idiots of all hues.
Post a Comment