Conveniently Forgotten People

May 30, 2010

(May 26, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It was reported widely that about forty bodies of house maids are brought back monthly from the Middle East to the Katunayake Air Port. That is more than one body a day. Our house maids in the Middle East are not moribund old grannies. They are mostly young women. These are certainly not natural deaths. This is like body bags brought back from a war front. It is not a war front but more like a slaughter house. Our women, daughters of Mother Lanka, citizens by descent of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka are being mercilessly used, abused, tortured and butchered by moneyed but illiterate, inhuman, uncivilized, savage Bedouins. What is Sri Lanka doing about it? NOTHING! Shame on all of us!
To go to the article click here.

Where is the outrage? The media? The feminists? The human rights organisations? Instead, people in the debased West are waxing lyrically about the beauty and sharia-compatible fashion sense of the second or third wife of some medieval Middle Eastern potentate, while the maidservants of those very people are being sent home in a body bag.

Statistically more than one each day.


I have thematised Sri Lanka once before already.
Read more...

Herzlichen Glückwunsch Gudrun!

May 29, 2010


Dr. Gudrun Eussner's www.eussner.net about politics and culture, is the best German language web site in the entire Internet. If you read German and are a lateral thinker who prefers to think outside the box, you'll find a wealth of information there. Without her encouragement, support and helpful information, this blog would long be dead.

Happy Birthday and Many Happy Returns, Gudrun!
Read more...

Men Who Deserve to Perish

May 27, 2010

The following was triggered off by a discussion about cinematography and the fact that more and more mainstream films that do not feature homosexuality AS SUCH, include "gay sex" scenes. I don't even own a TV set, hardly ever go to the cinema and buy a DVD only if it's become cheap enough, so I am usually years behind, but I have never found that a disadvantage. However, I find this instant of another offputting "in-our-face" strategy of the "gay" lobby still worth a comment. Homosexuals are a small minority (although they are working hard on changing that) yet the heterosexual majority is FORCED to acknowledge their sexuality, once it's featured in mainstream films. This is not new but still topical:
DANIEL CRAIG is urging movie bosses to revolutionise the JAMES BOND franchise by including a gay scene involving the superspy in the follow-up to CASINO ROYALE. The heart-throb actor has also reportedly told studio chiefs he is prepared to film a full frontal nude scene to please both his male and female admirers. He says, "Why not? I think in this day and age, fans would have accepted it. "I mean, look at (British TV series) DOCTOR WHO - that has had gay scenes in it and no one blinks an eye."
So the perversion and corruption has already gone far enough for a (presumably) straight man to want to appeal to his female AND MALE "admirers" (in a sexual sense). Now come, all you straight people and tell me that the thought that a nude display of your body might "please admirers" of the same sex does NOT make you puke your guts out! The time that such a display of my own body might have done that is not all THAT long ago not to be sure that I, for one, WOULD have puked my guts out. As an aside: The fact alone, that an ugly but otherwise insipid blonde weasel like Daniel Craig could acquire "heartthrob" status and be considred "rugged" speaks for itself. He is neither breathtakingly handsome like Roger Moore nor breathtakingly male like Sean Connery. And he has just an average physique as well, if that. How anybody who ever saw the pectorals and other assorted muscles of a Lloyd Bridges can find the remotest pleasure (whether aesthetically or sexually) in a nonentity like Daniel Craig is beyond me. Notabene that men in the past weren't afraid either to show that they had chest hair, different from the girlie- or neutered men of today.

In this context it ought to be mentioned that in America a population-wide decline in men’s testosterone levels during the last 20 years can be noted, that is not related to normal aging or to health or lifestyle factors known to influence testosterone levels. In plain English: They don't have an explanation for that phenomenon. This decline is consistent with other long-term trends in male reproductive health, such as decreases in sperm quality, increases in testicular cancer or cryptorchidism. The societal neutering of men has gone a long way already. No doubt, watching Daniel Craig in the buff will lower the average American male's testosterone level by another 10 percent.

Good luck to you, American men! No doubt, deriving pleasure from the fact that you are really, really good boys and in all thinkable situations impeccably politically correct will, one day soon, give you more pleasure than the act of procreation. You have gone a long way already towards the brave new world of an Andrea Dworkin, whose vision was that men are reduced to sperm banks on two legs, whose only useful occupation would be the occasional contribution to the gene pool. Men who are too scared to preserve their own sexuality deserve to perish.



Similar entries were posted at TMDSC and The Evil Style Queen.
Read more...

Happy Birthday Beak

May 26, 2010

Read more...

Wither Americans!

May 25, 2010

Let me tell you, the Hun in us Germans is still alive!
BOSTON (FOX 25 / MyFoxBoston.com) - A serious car crash involving a local lawmaker and a suspected illegal immigrant is threatening to reignite already heated debates about immigration on Beacon Hill, according to police reports obtained by FOX25.

State Rep. Mike Moran of Brighton was rear-ended by a suspected illegal immigrant this week. The suspect was wearing a Mexican costume at the time of the crash where he slammed into Moran at 60 mph.

The suspect, 27-year-old Isaias Naranjo, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, leaving the scene of an accident and driving without a valid license. According to the report, when told of the serious charges he would be facing, he just laughed.

[...]

The suspect, whose blood alcohol content was .25 at the time of the accident according to the police report, is being held on $50,000 cash bail.
So an illegal immigrant caused an accident driving while under the influence of alcohol. He had a blood alcohol content of 0.25 when the accident happened and when he was caught he found that funny, and now you have your knickers ... ooops, your lingerie ... in a knot.

You think THAT is noteworthy? What a bunch of wussies you are!

Let me tell you that WE had a bishop, notabene the pastoral head of the umbrella organisation of Germany's Protestant churches, notabene female, who was caught drunk driving because she had overlooked a red light and her blood alcohol content was a whopping 1.54.

And did we make such a fuss about it? Hell, no! After only three months she was received with standing ovations at the General Assembly of AA in the Germanosphere oecumenic church congress in Munich because all bishops of both denominations had tried and found out that even the most resilient of them had been pissed as a newt at .75 and wouldn't have been able to FIND his car, let alone open and drive it.

THAT, dear Americans, is news!

And now go and listen to Panzerlied.



Hat tip: Barely a Blog!
Read more...

The Whole Ugly Truth

May 22, 2010

The two little daughters of a German family kidnapped in Yemen 11 months ago, were rescued by Saudi forces on Monday in the border region between Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Details of the operations have not been revealed. There are conflicting reports about the operation, but officials said no shots had been fired. It will likely remain unknown whether a ransom was paid for the two girls or not.

Lydia and Anna Hentschel, six and four, were flown back to Germany in a Challenger 601 jet of the German Luftwaffe on Wednesday.

The fate of their parents, Johannes and Sabine Hentschel, remains unknown. The devout Christians had worked in a hospital run by a Protestant organisation in Sa’ada in the north-west of the country since 2003. Their baby son, Simon, is believed to have died.

The family was seized by gunmen on June 12, 2009 while on an excursion with two female German Bible school students, who had worked as assistant nurses, a British engineer and a female South Korean teacher. The badly mutilated dead bodies of the German Bible school students and the Korean teacher were found three days later. What happened to the Brit is unknown.

Several weeks after the kidnapping, a video appeared where the German children could be seen. The little boy, who reportedly looked exhausted, had been about one year old then, the girls five and three.

Lydia and Anna were with a relative, a doctor and a psychologist on their flight to Dresden after undergoing medical tests in Saudi Arabia. They are said to be in good health, well fed and not sunburnt. They are living with family and being shielded from the press. According to unconfirmed German media reports, the girls have apparently been looked after by an Arab family, which would explain why they speak Arabic with each other. Only the older one remembers some German. That would suggest, too, they have not had contact with their parents for a long time.

The brutality and length of this hostage taking may be explained by the fact that the girls father had been trying to convert Muslims to the Christian faith. German authorities believe that the Germans were regarded as Christian missionaries in Sa’ada and missionary writings were found in the belongings of the Bible students who have been murdered.

Johannes, a technician and Arabic speaker, and Sabine, a nurse, had fulfilled a dream by uprooting themselves from their home in Saxony seven years ago and moving to Yemen. They were employed by Worldwide Services, a Christian charity based in the Netherlands, which makes the qualification used by the media, that they "were regarded" missionaries, appear somewhat superfluous. To all intents and purposes, they WERE missionaries.

They had planned to return to Germany this year for their daughters to start school.

I won't say much about the parents. Just that this is just another sickmaking example of what German "idealism" is capable of doing. Because THEY thought THEY could bring the light to the savages in one of the most backward countries in the world, because of this preposterous arrogance, because they thought that made it worthwhile to start a family and live there, they are now most likely dead, together with their baby son who never had a chance.

And now everybody is pondering over the "riddle", the "mystery" of that kidnapping.

Why were the girls spared? Because they are children? Good joke. Then the little boy would have been with them. People long to believe in things nice, beautiful and good. The very likely truth in this case is neither.

Look at the little girls, how fair they are. Three respectively five more years from now, and and they would have been "marriageable" in an Islamic country. In chapter 3 of his epochal work "Mohammed - Leben und Legende" (life and legend) the German orientalist Tilman Nagel describes how expensive it is for a man in that world to marry outside his tribe. Because of that, they usually marry "uxorilocally". This may give us an idea how much interested chieftains would have had to pay to the captors of the little girls for one of them.

Obviously, the children's hair has been dyed. It looks like a henna job. People who have lived in the Middle East will tell you that children with blonde hair and a fair complexion are all the time admiringly touched and groped. So this was, again very likely, done to make them stand out less.

Later, married, they'd vanished beneath a niqab and only their husbands would have been able to enjoy their fairness.

It can only be hoped that the girls will awaken to this only when they are well into adulthood and strong enough to handle the truth about what might have happened to them.



My thanks go once again to Gudrun Eussner who helped me understand this.
Read more...

Amazing Grace



A clip from German television: The Grand Final of the 1st International Military Tattoo Moscow (Kremlin Zoria 2007).

Military bands from Denmark, Germany and Russia, pipes and drums of regiments from Scotland, Australia, the Republic of South Africa, Canada and New Zealand.

Amazing grace indeed!
Read more...

Unfair to the Devil

May 21, 2010

Ulla Jelpke (58), consecutively hairdresser, office hand, book dealer, prison warden and member of the German Bundestag for The Left party, an activity that left her finally with enough spare time to acquire degrees in sociology and commerce (that's she on the left together with the rest of her blog's sidebar), thinks that human rights are respected in Cuba. Asked, what about the political prisoners and lack of free speech there, she found that a "petty discussion". In 2006, that was. This just as an introduction.

Recently, she expressed concern regarding a "demonisation" of the former GDR and specifically the Stasi. That's not an isolated case. From Satanist circles it transpired that non-Satanists are systematically demonising the devil, a phenomenon that has sadly grown to be a global problem. Don't people have any shame anymore? What will be next? Demonising the Gestapo?

Big hat tip: Rainer Bonhorst.
Read more...

Draw Mo Day

May 20, 2010

"Punkt Punkt Komma Strich" is a German nursery rhyme to accompany the drawing of a simple face: "Dot dot comma line, finished is the moon face!"
Read more...

What a Maiz!

German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière [də mɛˈzi̯ɛːɐ̯] and a member of the Islam Conference, Hamideh Mohagheghi, meet the press after talks in Berlin on May 17, 2010.

A major round of government-sponsored talks with the intention to integrate Germany's Muslims into mainstream society opened at the German Historical Museum in Berlin on Monday. The Second Islam Conference, which will entail regular meetings between Muslim representatives and government officials until 2013, was opened by interior minister Thomas de Maizière, who urged a "strengthened participation of Muslims in Germany". "To strengthen the sense of belonging: That is our goal," de Maizière stated.

The conference is supposed, among other things, to draw up plans on how best to train imams and to teach the Islamic faith in schools. It would also support Muslim congregations' right to put them on a more equal footing with other religious bodies, such as churches, something which has far-reaching implications in Germany.

The First Islam Conference, which took place between 2006 and 2008 had "laid the groundwork for our dialogue," the over-optimistic minister said. However, it is making nobody happy, neither in its run-up, nor in its course, let alone in its aftermath.

"I am a bit sad that the state is marching ahead. In fact, I would have wished for the churches to lead this dialogue," de Maizière had stated at the recent oecumenic church congress (Kirchentag) at Munich. And: Christian churches need to make more efforts to come to terms with Islam, a view shared by many. "The churches are doing too little and the state is doing too little", staunchly Protestant canon- and constitutional law professor Gerhard Robbers said during the discussion. According to the law expert, Muslims are not fully recognized as German citizens. "There are too many religious policy jibes," he added, with reference to a ban on headscarves in German schools. "Such bans do not really take Muslims seriously as citizens of this country," Robbers said, and nobody laughed.

The conference includes 17 state representatives and 17 individuals and groups from the Muslim community. But only two of the country's four largest Muslim umbrella groups were at the table on Monday, namely the Turkish Islamic Union (Ditib) and the Union of Islamic Cultural Centers.

A row over the agenda and guest lists prompted Germany's Central Council of Muslims, an alliance of Sunni mosques throughout Germany, to boycott the talks, with its head, Ayyub Axel Köhler, a German convert, denouncing the conference as being "decreed by the government" and saying Muslims had been ignored. Köhler said the conference needs to include discussions about "Islamophobia" and discrimination against Muslims.

The Central Council of Muslims' general secretary, Aiman A. Mazyek, and chairman Axel Ayyub Köhler are considered moderates, while another member of the executive board, Ibrahim Faruk al-Zayad, is regarded with something almost bordering on suspicion. He heads the Islamic Community of Germany (IGD) as well, which is, by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (inland security) considerered to be the biggest organisation of the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany. Al-Zayad lost the election as chairman of the Council to Köhler, but is not without influence: His company is reportedly involved in more than 100 mosque building projects in Germany, also, he is married to a niece of Necmettin Erbakan and therefore has excellent contacts with extremist group Milli Görüs. He was as a guest at the Second Islam Conference.

Amazingly, de Maizière had already banned another group, the Islamrat, from the Conference, due to links with the same Milli Görüs. Leaders of Milli Görüs are under investigation for tax fraud and misuse of funds, plus, it has been accused of supporting a fundamentalist brand of Islam.

"These talks have been ill-fated under de Maizière," Green Party Co-chairman Cem Özdemir, the son of Turkish immigrants and paragon of Turko-German (or is it Germano-Turkish?) virtues, the first Muslim elected to chair a German party and considered entirely secular, was quoted as saying. He stressed that it ought to be aiming at full participation of Muslims in society, with all the rights and obligations that others have. "We need a road map with concrete requirements that Muslim organizations must fulfill in order to obtain recognition as a religious community," totally secular Cem said.

Another Greens leader and homosexual lobbyist, Volker Beck, accused de Maizière of having botched the conference: "The new meeting of the Islamic conference has failed before it has begun". He is particularly concerned, because the Islamic world is known to be specifically tolerant towards homosexuals.

Berlin's governing mayor and deputy head of the Social Democrats declared, in the same spirit and equally full of the endearing, if a bit misplaced, concern and care homosexual men seem to feel towards Islam, the Conference to be something of a stillborn child and de Mazière not to be sufficiently interested in it.

Monday's meeting was designed to turn some of the dialogue into practice, said de Maizière. "The working programme encompasses central questions related to the cooperation of minorities and Muslims in Germany." And: "The aim is to come up with defined tasks linked to the subjects on the discussion list."

"To turn some of the dialogue into practice" translates, of course, to: "To sell out our culture and values even more shamelessly to Muslims."

Who will, in turn, feel even more, among other things, misunderstood, excluded, hurt, insulted, overlooked, discriminated against, irgnored and marginalised. Here we have 5 percent of the population who totally dominate our discourse, mind, awareness, peace of mind and everyday life, and nobody seems to notice or to care.

De Maizière is the man who says that he would tolerate a headscarf as an expression of a religious conviction in his office, but not, should it be an "expression of a rejection or even aggressive stance targeted at what the German Ministry of the Interior stands for". The German Interior Minister, who set out and is supposed to protect our constitution, doesn't even know that this always, invariably, inevitably comes as a pair.
Read more...

The Slave Driverette of Modernity

May 19, 2010

Margot Kässmann, ex-bishopette of Hannover and ex-"chair" of the council of EKD and thus the highest-ranking of Protestant bishops of both sexes in Germany, retired in February, following a drunk driving incident.

The -- inevitable -- demise was taken as a sign of human strength as well as the drunken joyride was taken as an endearing sign of being "just human". She is an expert of and always appealing to basic human stupidity and laziness, for example when she was shameless enough to equate radicalism, religious zeal and potential danger of Muslim and Christian converts and when she draw a big slime trail right through the Scripture when she twisted it to justify the breach of her marital vows. This bishopette, notabene, is divorced, another matter that proves to her adoring followership how cute and endearingly human she is.

Three months and presumably one withdrawal treatment later, the demoted bishopette-soon-to-be-papette made a triumphant return to public life and was received at the oecumenic church congress (Kirchentag) at Munich last week with standing ovations. Serves the Catholic Church right for supporting something that starts with "oecumen". As a staunch opponent of the war in Afghanistan, she spoke about the transformation of a weapon of war into a sign of hope, long bow, rainbow and all that. Yes, we yawned too.

At a sermon in the gallant Cathedral of Our Dear Lady, Munich Archbishop’s own cathedral, no less, Kässmann warned against "demonising" birth control. "We may, however, see it as a gift from God as well" and, with her very own idiosyncratic ability to travel on a slime trail through theology, concluded "for it is about the preservation of life, of freedom, which doesn’t have to degenerate at once into pornography, as much as the sexualisation of our society is, of course, a problem." Can you stomach more? "It’s about love without fear and about responsible parenthood. And for women "it’s about concern for their own lives and those of their own children." Well, whatever. You get the general idea.

Cheers! (Yes I know, that was cheap.)

Dear Catholic Church, your son G. K. Chesterton once said: "The Catholic Church is the only thing which saves a man from the degrading slavery of being a child of his age." If you want to survive, spiritually and physically, run for the hills at the first sound of "oecumen...", and let the rest have a jolly good time with Ms. Kässmann.

Cross-posted at TMDSC.
Read more...

Biqqiya -- Taqqini

May 17, 2010

Edited to add:

I commented at Daniel Pipes' blog who sees the overproportional crownings of Muslim beauty queens as a mere matter of Affirmative Action:
Dear Mr. Pipes,

I am not a man so I can't know what a man considers "attractive", but I am under the impression that, as those pageants are supposed to crown beauty-, and not porn queens, their beauty ought to appeal to the male as well as to the female eye. So let me tell you from a woman's point of view that ALL those women are not attractive in a general, aesthetic meaning of the word. They are moderately pretty at best, plain at worst, and some, specifically the newly crowned Miss USA, are decidedly vulgar.

It is often asked why Rima Fakih got away with exhibiting herself at such a shameless event an American beauty pageant doubtlessly is. (I am making this statement not from a Muslim, but from a Catholic European point of view. As far as my and Muslim concepts of modesty seem to overlap, it is purely phenotypical.) Debbie Schlussel has some interesting information about the girl's family's involvement with Hisbollah to offer. That gives this girl's election a pretty disturbing spin far beyond political correctness and Affirmative Action.

One last remark: It would have been nice if you had stuck to the usual etiquette among bloggers and credited me with a link or at least a mentioning for providing you with the information about Shermine Sharivar.

Best regards
End of second addition.

Edited to add:

I watched some of the videos of those excrutiatingly embarrassing moments when the contestants are supposed to prove that they can still make some noise in spite of the lockjaw induced by that fatuous travesty of a smile are not just beautiful, but intelligent as well. Fakih thinks (THINKS? Well, whatever!) that birth control pills ought to be free for women and covered by health insurance because they are "costly". ("Hi Mom!") That is neither liberal speak nor anything connected with any human thought process, dumb, clever, good or evil, that is simply the squawking of a speaking doll. Should she have handlers, it probably took them some time to find a woman QUITE that moronic, which makes the allegations made by Schlussel comprehensible, plus that girl isn't even beautiful, hardly pretty. Three words describe her best, vulgar, vulgar and vulgar.

A zombie.

A zombie, however, who doesn't stand out like, as it should be, a sore thumb among its co-contestants. A cursory glance at the faces of the Miss USA aspirants made me ponder why Americans are doing that to their girls? Although some of them may be very pretty without that lockjaw and a less slutty styling, they without exception look at least ten years older than their biological age, some much older and, sad to say, shopworn.

End of addition.

Lawrence Auster discusses the on so many levels disturbing phenomenon of Muslim women winning beauty contests in Western countries when they are in no way more attractive than the walking breast implants with carefully dishevelled blonde manes on top and long legs below who used to be at the top of such classless, vulgar spectacles.

In fact, Rima Fakih, 24, of Dearborn, Michigan, even won the Miss USA beauty pageant yesterday. Ms. Fakih is a Muslim, she and her family are immigrants from Lebanon. She grew up in Queens, New York and moved to Dearborn a few years ago. Miss Michigan, who became Miss USA, is neither from Michigan nor American.

So is Islam mellowing by allowing Muslim girls to strut their stuff in bikinis? Good joke! Auster quotes Debbie Schlussel who clues us up that Rima Fakih's family has close ties to Hisbollah and that her donning a Bikini is just another version of taqqiya. Schlussel makes several good points but she still doesn't get a link from this site, go to VFR, there's a link.

My friend the 'gator states: "I'm surprised that we haven't heard anyone issue a fatwa against these women." Excellent point, which supports the taqqiya theory (actually more than just a theory).

Notabene that in the Seventies, pressure was applied indeed in such a case of "Western" aberration. Is it possible that almost 40 years ago Islam wasn't yet in such an advanced stage of conquering the West through the minds of its people and didn't know better than to resort to such unsubtle -- and honest -- methods?
Read more...

Britains Lubricant Future

May 15, 2010

If I look at Cameron and Clegg (I try not to) they look like the archetypical smooth, empty-faced and empty-headed twits Thatcherism and its aftermath has washed to the surface. Weren't it for their different ties, they'd be almost indistinguishable. One is oily, the other one greasy. (At least Gordon Brown, who belongs to a different generation, is clearly recognisable, although it isn't pleasant to do so.) However, it is interesting to have a closer look at their backgrounds.

Cameron is old establishment-upper middle class and if you go back in his pedigree, you'll find a lot of upper class men. Clegg is nothing of that sort. I am always deeply mistrustful of people who claim Russian aristocratic ancestry, it's a bit like the Shroud Christi or the formerly German property in Eastern Europe and miraculously expanded over the years, but in his case it comes from his paternal grandmother's side, so it doesn't matter so much anyway. (Women are always marrying their husband's class.) Clegg is by education (notabene that he went to a good, but lesser school than Cameron), profession and family sheer and undiluted middle class. I'd wager that, if one follows his patrilineal ancestry back, it's the opposite of Cameron's, namely that there will be middle middle- and lower middle class men soon and God knows what then. It may be a cynical view, but I think if it weren't so, we had been told in his biography.

Basically, here we have two upper middle class men, one old establishment, one the result of social climbing, who look exactly the same but come from very different backgrounds. The phenotypical versus the genotypical version, so to say.

Will it reflect on their politics? We don't know yet and I don't think so, but I found this at Clegg's Wikipedia entry :
His background has informed his politics. He says, "There is simply not a shred of racism in me, as a person whose whole family is formed by flight from persecution, from different people in different generations. It’s what I am. It’s one of the reasons I am a liberal."[13] His Dutch mother instilled in him "a degree of scepticism about the entrenched class configurations in British society".[14]
What a waffler! If suffering would make people better, Jews were bound to be the most saintly people on earth. (To "expect" that and to be "disappointed" if it turns out to be not the case, is antisemitic standard lore, by the way.) And in the last sentence he throws the people he has sworn to serve under the bus for the sake of making a few politically correct brownie points. I'd wager, too, that this is the statement of a man who ambitiously tried to assimilate to the old establishment, but hasn't quite managed to do so.

However, this is not more than a moderately interesting play with socio-historic notions. At the end of the day, Cameron will be the bigger traitor because he has sold out conservative principles to please the hedonistic whims of the politically correct, nihilistic crowd for whom the LibDems cater. Not that this was a very difficult thing for him to do, mind you.
Read more...

What will happen if an atheist makes moral judgements?

May 13, 2010

This:

Pat Condell is an atheist, who makes factually accurate and acerbicly witty videos about Islam and its threat to the West which can be found at YouTube. In one of his latest he tells us that he finally read the Koran to find that there is a sura saying something like (I paraphrase) "You have your religion and I have mine". On the strength of that, after three years and 65 of angry videos, he states at 5:32 that Islam "could have been beautiful" weren't it for those evil "Islamic scholars". If any Muslim would only read the Koran "what a different and vibrant religion it might be".

I am sorry that Condell has lost my respect, sorry for myself, that is, because it doesn't matter to him, even if he knew. It was my mistake to think here we have an atheist who is not intellectually, morally and ethically corrupt. If he was brought up as a Catholic, as he tells us, he is bound to have read the New Testament, but obviously, the many passages there that would have told him about the INHERENT, if not always practised, beauty of the Christian faith escaped his attention. Why?

How can he believe "scholars" have "twisted" Islam into what it is. Why did he overlook all the violent content in the Koran, yet cherrypicked one, seemingly tolerant, passage. How is it possible that "something ... could have been beautiful" that was created by a rapist, child molester and murderer. How can Pat Condell, with all his shrewd analysis, use the cliché of the many peaceful Muslims who have been betrayed by radical Islam?

I haven't read "Mein Kampf". I tried to, but it bored and embarrassed me, and as I don't think one can learn anything from it (the mechanisms of the Nazi movement are quite clear and well researched) and as I don't share the average German's fascination with The Beloved Führer, I haven't to this day. However, I am perfectly sure that there will be the odd short passage that, taken out of context, makes good advice. Now what about cherrypicking that, to then state that National Socialism "could have been beneficial" weren't it for those evil "Nazi party people". If any German had only read "Mein Kampf", "what a different and vibrant society Germany might have been".

Far fetched? But no! Different of Mohammed, Hitler didn't even set out as a murderer already (in fact he never personally killed anybody).The comparison is perfectly apt and reveals the entire madness, not just of Condell, but of all the "many peaceful Muslims who are being betrayed by Islamism" delusionists.
Read more...

We need more people like this man here

May 12, 2010

The regional Internet news service provider mittelhessen.de reports that a member of the parliament of the state of Hesse, Hans-Jürgen Irmer, is being investigated by the public prosecutor's office.

Irmer, who is a member of the Christian Democrats, sharply criticised the appointment of Aygül Özkan as Minister for Social Affairs in the state of Lower Saxony. The incriminated statements are in particular "Islam is hell-bent of conquering the world" and "We don't need more Muslims, but less".

Exactly what offence applies here is not clear yet, according to the public prosecutor's office. mittelhessen.de say they have information that the sedition- (comparable to hate speech) law may apply.

We can safely assume that the people who reported Irmer to the public prosecutor are precisely the same who will adamantly state that it's not allowed in Germany to tell the truth about Jews/Israel anymore.
Read more...

Wrong by Omission

May 11, 2010

An article about the elections in Germany's biggest state (by population) at The Irish Times caught my attention
Lighting a fire in Germany's heartland

DEREK SCALLY in Duisburg

Forget the UK – regional elections tomorrow in Germany could have far- reaching implications for Angela Merkel, Europe and Greece. And crucial to the outcome is the country’s former industrial heartland, the Rhine-Ruhr

NECESSITY IS the mother of invention and in the German city of Duisburg, the cash-strapped local government has become outrageously inventive.

A pensioner group was the first to notice the chill in its local swimming pool: to save money, the water temperature has been reduced by two degrees and opening hours slashed. Now unblushing city councillors want to introduce a tax on the city’s 20 “pleasure locales” – sex clubs and brothels – of €2 per 10 sq m of floor space.

It’s a taste of things to come in Duisburg, and in the entire Rhine-Ruhr region. Now struggling, it was once the wealthiest region of Germany that, like Liverpool and Newcastle, grew rich on the industrial revolution spoils of steel and coal.
For the entire article click here.

I rarely write letters "to the editor", but in this case I did so yesterday.
Dear Mr. Scally,

"DEREK SCALLY in Duisburg" on top of this message box -- does that mean that you are actually living in Duisburg? I really can't believe that because your analysis of the decline of that city fails to mention one of the most important reasons for it.

In an recent interview with the WELT, the new head of the staff union of the German police, Rainer Wendt, says that he thinks that the monopoly of the state on the use of physical force ("Gewaltmonopol") has become, in some "migrants' quarters" of the Republic, void. He specifically mentions parts of the cities of Berlin, Duisburg, Essen and Cologne.

Here's a crucial excerpt:

Wendt: There are parts of the cities of Berlin, Duisburg, Essen and Cologne, where police doesn't dare to tread anymore. If an officer makes a check on a driver who was caught speeding there, 40, to 70 friends will come to the scene in no time. And if the officer is harrassed by such a crowd, the rule of law has to capitulate and withdraw.

WELT ONLINE: And your explanation for that is a lack of respect for the power of the state?

Wendt: Isn't that apparent? The perpetrators don't accept the German legal systen and its representatives. By the way, it is well known that such blitz mobilisations are mostly performed by young men with a Turkish or Arab background. In such quarters, the monopoly on the use of physical force of the state is shaken. Officers experience something similar when they come to the scene of a punchfest between people of Turkish- or Arab descent. They will be pushed away again and again and be told: "That is an internal matter, get lost!" or "Shove off, we'll ask our hodja to manage that, not you".
(Translation mine: http://editrixblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/monopoly-on-violence-is-part-of.html)

Duisburg is the city that hosts Germany's biggest mosque. Duisburg covers 232,8 km² with a population of 496,665 (December 31, 2007). Statistically, 8% of the population are Muslims, but some suburbs have a population of more than 50% with a "migration background", as the politically correct description goes. It is empirically proven that a society can suffer as much as a Muslim population of 3%, above that, it will suffer. Duisburg is the city, too, where German police broke into a private home to remove a visible Israeli flag that 'offended' Muslims.

You describe Duisburg's inner city in detail. Are you really saying that you didn't notice the many headscarf-clad women there? Germans rarely shop at low-cost chain stores, even if they are strapped for cash.

You compare the people of the Rhine-Ruhr region with England's northerners. I know the North of England well and yes, you are right. One of my grandfathers was a miner, the other a steelworker. Indeed, we are a tough, straight-talking lot. Yes, the hardships and humiliations of the past decades have sapped our confidence, but hardly in the way you describe. Have none of the people you interviewed for your article mentioned that? For example what it means for a woman to be faced with a deeply misogynist and violent culture? Or the schoolchildren who are victimised on a daily basis? Maybe not, because even that tough, straight-talking lot is afraid now to be labelled "Nazi" or "racist". And that is the worst that can happen to one in our Brave New Germany. It has destroyed people's livelihood and reputation already. Rest assured, very few of us are.

Best regards,
Nora Brinker
The elections were held on Sunday. The pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) hit another low, winning just 6.7 percent of the votes. Merkel's Sacré-Cœur Socialists (who have shed the Sacré-Cœur-bit long ago) lost disastrous 10.2 percent to end up with 34.6 percent as their worst result in Northrhine-Westphalia ever. It means, too, that the Merkel-administration has lost its majority in the Bundesrat (the "upper house").

So the current government coalition won the support of less than 42 percent of the voters. We have a stalemate situation and what the future governance will look like is, right now, a matter of everybody's guess.

The all over results:
CDU 34.6 percent
SPD 34.5 percent
Greens 12.1 percent
FDP 6.7 percent
The Left 5.6 percent
Others 3.9 percent.

Notabene that a 5 percent clause applies to elections in Germany.

There is a rare public consensus that the Merkel administration was bitch-slapped for their magnanimous help for bankrupt Greece, also, tax cuts, which had been promoted by them, don't go down very well with the notoriously jealous egalitarian Germans, they might, after all, benefit the rich.

How is this reconcilable with the dramatic claims I made in my above "letter to the editor"? The reply is: Easily! A whopping 40.7 percent of the voting public did not vote at all and it is safe to assume that they have resigned long ago because there is no alternative whatsoever between the two major parties (it drives me up the wall if I read about "Merkel's conservatives"), because they have been shut up long ago by the threat of being labelled "Nazi" and other more or less subtle means, ranging from manipulation to threats, and because they are worn-out and have simply ceased to care. What remains to do once you've realised that roughly 16% of Turks, the by far biggest minority in Germany, are dependent on welfare, twice the share of Germans, and that the unemployment rate among them is 23%, compared with 10% for Germans (applying to 2005, the last year for which data are available) and THAT NO PARTY YOU MAY VOTE FOR WILL DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. Given, that most rural regions in East Germany are entirely without any Turkish population, the ratio is much more overwhelming in those parts of the country (like the Rhine-Ruhr region) where Turks make up for a two-digit percentage.

Derek Scally (in Duisburg, no less) says that:
With its huge working-class population, the Ruhr was once a stronghold of Social Democrat (SPD) voters. Rabes says he’s an SPD voter at heart, but like many here he has no interest in voting. The forces at work, squeezing his quality of life, are beyond the control of any political party, he says.
Really? And I wonder what those "forces at work" might be? The most truth- and meaningful statement in Derek Scally's article is made in the headline already. The Ruhr-region IS Germany's "heartland". Full stop. And it has been conquered long ago. Chance? I don't think so.

My personal consequence? I moved to former East Germany more than 3 1/2 years ago. Right now, I am living in a tiny community in the Ore Mountains close to the Czech border in a virtually Islam-free environment, where I hope to grow old. (I mean REALLY old.) Of course, I realise that this is just a variant of the "being worn-out and having ceased to care" mentality.

Should I receive a reply to my letter, I will update this entry.
Read more...

A Sleazy Spectacle

May 09, 2010

Yesterday, 25 years years ago, on the fortieth anniversary of the end of WWII, Richard von Weizsäcker, then President of the Federal Republic of Germany, delivered a speech in an address to the German parliament that marked a new aera for the German public image: "May 8th was a day of liberation. It freed us all from the inhumane system of National Socialist rule." While this was, strictly speaking, true, that wasn't how most Germans saw it in 1945, so the message this speech was supposed to convey, namely that Germany had overcome its past of lies, silence, denial and repression, was plainly wrong. Apart from persecuted groups, political prisoners and concentration camps inmates, it is fair to say that virtually no one felt liberated and that the event was rather perceived as an anticlimax by the vast majority of Germans, an anticlimax which had caused, together with the demise of the state, that of their hopes and ambitions. The story of Germany since then has been one firmly assuring the world -- and themselves -- that Germans knew nothing or very little of what was happening around them and that they could have done nothing, even if they had known, anyway. This speech, no doubt given in good faith, delivered the ideological underpinning for that, so, although hailed as an important first step towards a new image, just gave the old rhetoric a new spin. The innocent German people had been hijacked by some evil, almost alien, force that went by the names of "Hitler" and "the Nazis". Austria and East Germany could even be less bothered with soul searching, hadn't they been, after all, according to their own interpretation of history, somehow been forcibly occupied by "Hitler's Germany" in the course leading to WWII.

Since then, "our past" has been, and is, shamelessly abused. For example, when Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer explained 1999 why he was in for sending German troops to Kosovo, it was with reference to the same "past" and who cared that this had been before a reason for Germany precisely not to send troops abroad: "No more Auschwitz, no more genocide, no more fascism", just as "our past" is, specifically disingenious, used as the excuse to side with Israel's enemies and to "stand with praise and censure at Israel's side as ethical probation officer to keep the victim from committing a second offence." Wolfgang Pohrt, who coined this priceless quote, went on saying that the Germans with their obsession with responsibility ("Verantwortungsfimmel") resemble a convicted child molester who thinks he is specifically qualified for a job as kindergarden teacher. All in the name of "our past".

Off my soapbox now and back to today's business. In the light of this, can somebody explain please what Merkel's business was to be in Moscow today? She looked even more incongruous than Hu Jintau and only marginally less so than the French troops. (And boy, DID they look incongruous! It was, after all, a victory parade.)

Either Germany lost the war and has still some responsibility to bear, then she had no business to be there, or the "Germans just needed to be freed from the inhumane system of National Socialist rule" spin has really won them all. But then, maybe it's REALLY just business and we'll have after Gazprom Gerd our very own Alfa Angie soon.
Read more...

About 'amour propre' and 'faire référence'

May 04, 2010

Or: Where Are The Thinking Little Blogger's Role Models

A week or so ago Gudrun Eussner made us aware that Andrew Bostom accuses his erstwhile friend Robert Spencer of plagiarism. Shortly after, Lawrence Auster picked it up at VFR and added a photo to his entry where the three Eternal Pillars of Islam Critique look like what they finally turned out to be, a bunch of trolls. Any doubts we may have had about that so far have been safely removed.

The funny-ha-ha level on which Bostom deals with such a grave accusation is something we might expect at a blog like -- say -- this one, but not at a paragon's of serious Islam critique. When all is said and done, the only concrete accusation boils down to Spencer using a Maimonides-quote without crediting Bostom, who had found and used it first. Some of the other alleged, and rather unspecified, transgressions happened, mind you, in 2008.

All this said, there can't be the slightest doubt that the reason for Bostom's undignified, unsubstantiated and over-the-top attack on a former friend and ally is something totally and utterly unrelated to "Islam critique", and that is where this blog entry could end. "Andy" is certainly not the first and not the last paragon of something who unmasks himself in the end as an assclown. However, Lawrence Auster makes us aware that there are further aspects to this when he chides Spencer of narcissism (the pathological variant, no less!) because the latter stated that what Bostom did to him was akin to "give fuel to the Islamic supremacists and their enablers". Frankly, I fail to see that, and while Spencer is not the epitome of Islam critique, he is for many, and for many little bloggers as well, a figure to look up to as an expert and to go to for reference. Whether that is merited or not is a different question. It just is so and such a vile, basically unfounded and unfair attack might indeed give fuel to jihadists. Auster then goes on to add a hefty dose of Luke 18:9-12 to his criticism, which is a pity.

Si tacuisses, and all that, looking further into the matter, it becomes patently clear that Spencer (Geller isn't even in the picture) is really painfully miscast for this role, at least for a little blogger who does his (or her) homework. Case in point:
This is a common species of wishful thinking and willful blindness. Its proponents imagine that Islam is a Religion of Peace(TM) with no anti-Semitic elements (you know the drill, Islam reveres the "People of the Book," etc.), but it was corrupted by the Nazis. Thus all one needs to do to solve this problem is to eliminate the Nazi elements and call Muslims back to the true teachings of the Qur'an, and the jihad will end. How wonderful! Except it's completely fictional, and based on ignorance or denial of the jihad doctrine, Islamic supremacism, and Qur'anic anti-Semitism.

Note also what my estimable and indefatigable colleague and collaborator Pamela Geller has revealed about the Mufti of Jerusalem's role in the Holocaust, and his own radio broadcasts.
I am not a native English speaker, so my first thought was that is MUST BE my fault. He really wouldn't have said that Pamela Geller revealed something about the Mufti of Jerusalem's role in the Holocaust, and his radio broadcasts. So did he? Lets have a closer look:
Note also what my estimable and indefatigable colleague and collaborator Pamela Geller has revealed about the Mufti of Jerusalem's role in the Holocaust, and his own radio broadcasts
So she didn't publish it, she didn't make it known to a wider public, she didn't introduce the Mufti, his doings and his role in the Holocaust to her readership, no -- she REVEALED it. Merriam Webster informs us about the meaning of the verb "to reveal":
1 : to make known through divine inspiration
2 : to make (something secret or hidden) publicly or generally known
3 : to open up to view : display
Yes he did.

Fact is, this little blogger introduced the Mufti Hadj-Amin El Husseini and his role in the Holocaust to her readership, first on Friday, May 19, 2006 (Child Molesters Comparing Notes) then again on Saturday, May 20, 2006 (A Very Practical and Attractive Religion for Soldiers) and later repeatedly, the last time on December 17, 2009.

I relied on, and quoted, several sources already existing in the Internet, among them Tell The Children The Truth, La bibliothèque proche-orientale or Kosovo and the Holocaust: Falsifying History and ISLAM UNDER THE SWASTIKA: The Grand Mufti and the Nazi Protectorate of Bosnia-Hercegovina, 1941-1945, both by Carl Savich. At the time of my first entries about the Mufti, I advised my readers, too: "... or do a simple Google search, as the sources are too numerous to mention here." Here are the results of a Google search performed today including the parameters "mufti" and "broadcast". "Revealed", eh?

So what did Geller say? The link Spencer provides above leads to one of her usual shrill, PMS-ing and self-serving posts. Her (uncredited) quotes can be traced back, for example, to the website "The Empress' ooops... The Emperor's Clothes", and to the books "The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Husseini" by Chuck Morse and "Icon of Evil: Hitler's Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam" by David Dalin, John Rothmann and Alan Dershowitz.

Right! Pamela Geller "revealed" the truth about Hadj-Amin, invented the wheel and devised the Wonderbra. (Sorry, I couldn't resist!) And what that Robert Spencer makes I better don't say because even this blog has a lower bound to its tone, besides, we don't want to give fuel to jihadists and their enablers (ha ha). Is this "plagiarism"? Of course not. A term like that would lead us in the realms of academia or at least serious journalism. It is plain, simple and unabashed Internet attention whoredom on a par with some pimpled teens' bragging at an Internet social network about their sexual derrings-do. What little bloggers need is not a role model to look up to, but some clay-feet detector and a lot more self-reliance.



Here are some of my earlier Foo Foo (or is it Kermit?) and Miss Piggy posts:
Foo Foo and Miss Piggy Go Islam Critics
'German Patriot' Converts to Islam
Loose Apes with Razors
The Unembarrassables
Innocents Abroad


Read more...

Be Careful What You Wish For II

May 03, 2010

Aygül Özkan (38) wasn't even sworn in when the designated Minister for Social Affairs in the German state of Lower Saxony caused controversy already by calling for a ban on crucifixes in state schools, thus making unambiguously clear what is most near and dear to her heart.

Özkan was set to be, and is now, Germany's first Muslim minister on government level.

She is a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Sacred Heart Socialist party, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), that has dropped the "Sacred Heart" bit long ago and is labelled with stubborn obtusity "conservative" by the international media. The controversial statement was made during an interview with the newsmagazine "Fokus" on April 24 to the orgasmic approval of the politically up-to-date mainstream. Özkan hastened to say that a ban of crucifixes in classrooms would apply to headscarves in schools as well, ignoring the fact that the cross has a fundamentally different meaning to Christians than the headscarf to Muslims.

However, her comments triggered off at least some criticism in her own party. The man who appointed her, Lower Saxony state premier/governor, Christian Wulff, distanced himself from his minister-to-be's statement: "Christian symbols, above all the crucifix in schools, are welcomed by the state government in Lower Saxony in keeping with the practice of tolerant education on the basis of Christian values," Wulff told news agency dpa.

And: "Mrs Özkan expressed her personal opinion on religious neutrality, but she's not questioning the practice in Lower Saxony." Well, whatever.

She then apologised, stating that she doesn't know the state of Lower Saxony all that well, which is, of course, an excellent starting point to govern it.

Özkan was born in Hamburg to Turkish immigrants. A lawyer by training, she joined the CDU six years ago. Before her appointment, she was the party's economic policy spokeswoman for the parliamentary group in Hamburg. Earlier this month, Christian Wulff had called her appointment "a good signal for children and young people with immigrant backgrounds", the implications of which must have gone a mile high over his duncecap.

Özkan is indeed for all things that are beneficial to her ethnic brethren and, will wonders ever cease, disadvantageous to the vast majority of the people she has sworn to serve and from whom to avert damage, like Turkey's entry to the European Union, double citizenship or the recognition of foreign univesity diploma. She has taken the "integration" portfolio over from the Ministry of the Interior, to which it used to belong.

She swore her oath of office "by God" last Tuesday, using a traditional formula in German, promising to faithfully perform her duties as minister ... "so help me God". Alternatively, she could have used the non-religious wording, "I solemnly promise...", however, she didn't. (Notabene that oaths in Germany are not sworn on the bible, which would have clarified matters, but simply recited aloud.) In a written statement afterwards, Özkan made clear that she is an observant Muslim and had deliberately appealed to "the one and only God" to whom Muslims, Christians and Jews pray, which is, come to think of it, even more disingenuous than comparing headscarf and cross, but at least it gave some dotty old theologians out of touch with political realities the opportunity to mumble that this is not so and why, something nobody who didn't know that anyway wanted to hear.

Lawyer-by-training and German by naturalisation Özkan also sees German courts as an "alien authority". In an interview with the "Berliner Morgenpost" she stated:
We urgently need more judges with a migration background, so that the aggrieved parties can see that it is not an alien authority that makes the decision, but that we are part of it as well.
Let's forget about the implications of the "we" this German minister is using so liberally, and concentrate on the really interesting bit: WHY would Turkish... sorry: judges with a Turkish migration background, who will have to have the necessary German law degrees and will, of course, apply German law, NOT be seen as an "alien authority" by other Turks? Naughty girl! I hope she isn't talking about "race" here! But then, it's probably just another dose of that taqqiya which is, no doubt, the most advanced art form the Muslim world developed.

Most recently, it transpired -- on Workers Day, no less -- that Özkan during her time as a manager with the private mail service provider TNT has closed in 2008 work contracts that are considered, if not illegal, to be against public policy, or to translate the German term more literally, unethical. Terms like a wage rate of Euro 7.50 per hour, Euro 2.30 below the minimum wage of the Deutsche Post, plus 10% unpaid excess work usually don't go down well with the trade unions here. It remains to be seen now whether the German public feels more solidly united with Les Damnés de la Terre or with our fellow citizens with a migration background. My money is on the latter.

Thanks to the state of Lower Saxony we know now whom not to appoint for a government office, thanks to the state of Lower Saxony as well we know, too, that it is not the "migration background" that causes the trouble.



My older entries Be Careful What You Wish For and Why Allah is not the God of the Bible may be interesting in this context as well.
Read more...